Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Glad they were faithful with this sequel.
The water thing is integral to the story. Play the game, and you'll understand
No they won't, if they're dumb enough to think this game has been in active development for 12 straight years...
Play "starfield" for that mate. *eyeroll
Did he even play? No. He doesn't even have a mark indicating he has the game. Besides, his 12 years in development comment shows he knows nothing about the game or it's development. They've only been working on it for a few years. He's just a troll.
It doesn't look like much from this angle but in the game the scale of the mountains is crazy.
It's actually a very nice map.
have you played the game? It feels massive when youre actually playing.
That picture without context in game doesn't do the actual map any justice. When you are actually traversing the map, it feels a lot bigger than it looks because you can't just go in a straight line everywhere, don't have mounts, etc.
The size of the game world is very least of my gripes. If you want to talk about optimization or mouse/keyboard control, I'll be on board.