Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
1080p master peaceful gaming
3060 ti, ryzen 7 5800x
high settings
Stable 60fps
I've seen benchmarks even getting this to run on something like a 1660ti + i7-9750H, which should be well below the threshold but somehow it still runs in the ballpark of 30fps at 1080p...about as well as it does for some people with significantly better hardware.
I have no idea how the optimization can be that all over the place.
That said it's pretty annoying because capcom has been doing these practises for years now in all their games and until recently they were the darlings of gaming again. Yet the MTX practises where pretty much the same as we are getting here like they were in DMC. that is .. not only optional but not worth buying at all if you actually want to play the game.... pretty much everything is available in game.
Also more misinformation about not being able to play more than one character (seriously, learn to computer) and performance which although not perfect how many games in this day and age release perfectly optimised? Sure really should have been built into the game but it's basically exactly like DD1 in these regards. The travel system too.
Basically a massive knee jerk over reaction fed by Drama farmer content creators on you tube who probably havent even playd the game for the most part.
Optimization is pretty not good though. I have a pretty high end computer and I still can only get 100fps out of town and 60-70 in town.
2. A basic feature such as "New Game" not being included
3. MtX. They have zero place in single player games and there is no reasonable excuse to include them.
I'm very bad at elden ring or souls like games, but the combat still feels a lot more fluid and precise than DD2.
graphics are absolutely not up to modern standards...
It looks worse than the remaster of witcher 3, worse than cyberpunk (came out like 3 or 4 years ago. it looks worse than RDR2 and also worse then Elden Ring. Yet the game performance horrible in comparison.
this is just trolling/brigading
if you like this style game DD2's biggest negative is that it's more of DD1.
Every system, everything gameplay related and MTX related is only from people not aware of what DD is, if you enjoyed the first this is just more of that.
If you weren't aware, this has the same problems that made others NOT like DD... it can be seen as a mediocre/clunky version of witchers/zelda/insert_your_favoite_open_world_rpg
That said, the optimization is awful. The game is CPU capped, GPU doesn't even factor in.
People playing on PS5 do not have the performance problems and any fanatic of the series has recommended the PS version as the best version. PC controls/settings/etc are not polished to the point that this was likely developed as a PS5 game and ported everywhere else. I have a potatopc and it runs about as good as my broz $3000 modern rig. That makes people upset, rightfully so.
From a DD1 fan: all of the MTX is ignorable. In fact this game feels far more accessible and robust than DD1 to the point that it's trivially easy.
The performance issues are real. The various benchmarks I've seen seem to be theoretical and not actually done via real playing of the game. 100% of the DLC/DRM gripes are valid.
But again, the reviews are basically review bombs from a few forums/discords waging general war against that they couldn't make children-ish characters in the creator / against capcom / against steam / against capitalist democracy. All basically ignorable and could be applied (and have been) across the boards on basically every new release in the past few years.
I personally think this is close to a best case scenario with MTX. It's an option for people who are going to put 100s of hours into the game to support the game. The value for the cost is minuscule to the point that it's not even really alluring to buy the MTX.
Yes, and DD1 was equally subpar in the graphics themselves, at that time, to allow the gameplay to do what it does.
witcher 3 came out 3 years after dragon's dogma 1. and this is just a beefed up DD1.
The person saying "souls games have the worst combat and controls" is absolutely delusional. They actually said "souls-like" which makes no sense because it's not like there's one company doing all soulslikes... so i'll assume they meant "ds/sekiro/elden."
Those games were heralded for how the hitboxes and controls worked, and the fluidity/accuracy of all of the various weapons/bosses. Yeah, they have their specific problems, but what is better if those are "the worst?"
Anything that has more fluidity does it by being more actiony/scripted, and anything more accurate is far less fluid...
So if you're saying soulslikes are "inaccurate" i don't know what you were playing when demon's souls came out that was anywhere near that quality.
is it improvement from the first one? is it worse? they didn't know the answer because most people who whines never played the first game.
If they can annoy you enough, then it might make mtx seems appealing, in their pov.
Ferrystones are very rare, usually found in chests at the end of medium sized dungeons or caves.
I have no idea where I got a port crystal, I think it was after the dullahan boss fight.