Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
its big monsters you fight but i think its hard to compare to monster hunter.
at best you can compare the monster fights to something more like the witcher but even then this is still far different from even that
Other than that, you're not tracking monsters, there isn't as big of an emphasis on ecology and hand-crafted areas design to be replayed in, or instances.
Realistically the games are different enough that you can't really compare, but similar enough that if the main reason you like MHW is just ARPG combat, you'll probably enjoy DD2? But if you like the other factors, like difficulty, tracking, etc. then you may not like DD2, or at the very least it's not like MHW enough for you.
Bad comparisons as well. Probably worse than MH.
I really don't understand the comparisons to Skyrim. If anything it's more like Morrowind, but only in quest design. The actual game is not similar in anyway to any Bethesda game.
Wrong... What?