Dragons Dogma 2 is a Flop! 8/10 from IGN!

[wakeupmarkey]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jU-vkDLoGwQ&ab_channel=IGN

You can watch the review basically 8/10 is much lower because we know IGN loves to rate higher then the actual REAL rate imo.

I'm sad to announce this game will not live up to the hype

[Fortie]

I read few reviews and almost everyone said the same ... Game itself is a masterpiece, just console optimalization sucks so hard :)

[Settings]

Originally posted by LnW Lucifer_DaBEAST:

If you trust IGN reviews in 2024.. I got bad news for you.

Bruh for real. If IGN told me my drinking water was safe I'd panic.

[up2zero]

IGN is known for giving good games bad scores and giving perfect scores for games like Starfield.

[Settings]

Originally posted by up2zero:

IGN is known for giving good games bad scores and giving perfect scores for games like Starfield.

Hey.. Hey.. in fairness, they changed Starfields score to a 7 after a huge public backlash against the game.

[Gyson]

Originally posted by CPTButtSavage:

Originally posted by LnW Lucifer_DaBEAST:

If you trust IGN reviews in 2024.. I got bad news for you.

Bruh for real. If IGN told me my drinking water was safe I'd panic.

See, these are examples of bias. Of the criticisms brought up (some janky gameplay, AI inconsistencies, problematic camera angles), what do you disagree with and why?

[Settings]

Originally posted by Gyson:

Originally posted by CPTButtSavage:

Bruh for real. If IGN told me my drinking water was safe I'd panic.

See, these are examples of bias. Of the criticisms brought up (some janky gameplay, AI inconsistencies, problematic camera angles), what do you disagree with and why?

It isn't a bias to say a company that is famous for their bought and paid for reviews, lack of credibility, and who have been caught outright reviewing games they've never played hundreds of times in the past isn't credible. Sorry you're upset you don't have better ammo to troll with from reviews homie lol

[KaijuSoul]

Why do you give that much of a ♥♥♥♥ about a bunch of people who get paid to espouse their opinions. form your own.

[Katah]

Originally posted by Gyson:

Originally posted by CPTButtSavage:

Bruh for real. If IGN told me my drinking water was safe I'd panic.

See, these are examples of bias. Of the criticisms brought up (some janky gameplay, AI inconsistencies, problematic camera angles), what do you disagree with and why?

Its all subjective. What I might find janky you may never have noticed at all.

[[S.A.S]sephchan]

Didn't read, didn't click, don't care

[Musika]

Funny because IGN expected it to be a sequel. LMAO. Played the game and yet didn't understand it.

[Venirto]

I'm getting Deja Vu from the time when IGN gave Starfield 7/10. People were upset when that review came out, then agreed with the score few weeks later.

[Wendygoon]

Imagine unironically using IGN as any kind of accurate and fair rating system.

[CadaveR]

70 score reviews are clown take. Like "in 2024 no quest marker? hell no"

[Settings]

Originally posted by 𝐂𝐚𝐝𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐑:

70 score reviews are clown take. Like "in 2024 no quest marker? hell no"

"Game said it wouldn't have quest markers and did exactly that. As someone born in 2012, I'm furious."

[TFG]

8/10 is a flop? Since when?