Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Vote with your wallet, is all I can say. But this game isn't really strong on the woke ideology and doctrine. They're trying hard to find a compromise, which is something Capcom has been doing for a while.
I don't think i said there was anything bad about creating male characters. My point was more about not being able to create beautiful, cute and attractive female characters.
Why can't you make a short female character? Why can't you make big breasts or go full on flat? What's again with the whole body type 1 and body type 2? Where's the female and male choices? What's with the devs making posts only about male character creator on their social media, even going as far as to zoom their ass but nothing like that about female characters?
It sure looks like it though. Japanese are known for making beautiful and cute waifus, not whatever this is.
Doesn't prevent you from creating "beautiful, cute and attractive female characters".
Doesn't prevent you from creating "beautiful, cute and attractive female characters".
Has nothing to do with creating "beautiful, cute and attractive female characters".
You're saying your point is about one thing but your agenda seems to be something else entirely.
You can't refute any points i made.
Ad Hominem
Is he wrong though?
Wasting your breath, OP wants an "attractive, flat chested, short, female" child but just doesn't mention that last part.
Are you saying that really wasn't your point? I'm using my shocked face now.
Edit: Look, I'll address what you're actual points seem to be. You can't create a child for your adventuring avatar; this isn't unusual for an RPG.
I feel like the character creator allows for chests sizes large enough to border on being ridiculous for someone who hopes not to develop chronic back issues six hours into an adventure.
I feel like the character creator allows your chest to be flat enough given that armor will be covering you most of the time anyway.
I feel like getting bent out of shape over the labels used for the two body options is beyond silly. Perhaps from now on the developers should just start labeling them "This one" and "This other one", or (better yet) no labels at all and let the player's eyes figure it out, but I suspect people would probably still complain because they're determined to be overly sensitive about everything.