安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
But seriously maces had higher base damage and were more effective against the undead and armour and stuff, but I think if you wanted to cut off tails and whatnot you had to use a bladed weapon.
Fighter is the one who can use a mace. Maces were unique to Mystic Knight in part 1. Now Fighter can also use maces as well as the usual sword. The good news the mace has it's own moveset and is not cheaply re-using sword movesets.
The same can't be said for Warrior's warhammer which is just the same moveset as greatwords with the only difference is it does Blunt damage as opposed to Slash damage. Blunt damage more effective on skeletons/bony enemies. The wiki doesn't really describe Blunt damage well. Imo there's no real difference between the two and a big waste of resources, not enough difference you'll be carrying both types in case you come across skeletons or not.
https://hacktheminotaur.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/dragons-dogma-2-warrior-1024x576.webp