Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But seriously maces had higher base damage and were more effective against the undead and armour and stuff, but I think if you wanted to cut off tails and whatnot you had to use a bladed weapon.
Fighter is the one who can use a mace. Maces were unique to Mystic Knight in part 1. Now Fighter can also use maces as well as the usual sword. The good news the mace has it's own moveset and is not cheaply re-using sword movesets.
The same can't be said for Warrior's warhammer which is just the same moveset as greatwords with the only difference is it does Blunt damage as opposed to Slash damage. Blunt damage more effective on skeletons/bony enemies. The wiki doesn't really describe Blunt damage well. Imo there's no real difference between the two and a big waste of resources, not enough difference you'll be carrying both types in case you come across skeletons or not.
https://hacktheminotaur.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/dragons-dogma-2-warrior-1024x576.webp