Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yeah and since the pawn turns into the Arisen it would make sense that they have it too.
Of course I did, didn't you?
Alternate world, not universe
https://nordic.ign.com/dragons-dogma-ii/79804/news/dragons-dogma-2-fans-are-creating-some-wonderful-and-horrific-beings-in-its-character-creator
You know what they mean though, in Dragons Dogma lore there are multiple universes through which pawns can travel through freely to help Arisens on different worlds.
Call it what you want but they are essentially the same thing, it is purely an argument of semantics.
Not sure what your point is? Alternate world or universe it does not really change anything does it? Or are you just arguing for the sake of arguing?
Well I would argue that parallel world and parallel universe are used pretty much interchangeably even if it is in an alternate universe it is still primarily in a world that runs parallel to the original world.
But if it helps move things along ok fine, you are right, the pawn gets transported to an
"alternate universe", happy? Still don't see how this offers a fundamentally different story or experience?
oh and just for posterity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_universes_in_fiction
I am sorry do you have a point? I am pretty sure those who have played the previous Dragons Dogma game have a rough idea of how the Dragons Dogma multiverse works regardless of whatever label you want to put on it, I think you might be a little too preoccupied with definitions my dood.
I really don't see what arguing over definitions has to do with the conversation?
take note of the use of the word not in this case it signifies the stature of being wrong.