Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"nooo pink has no base color vocation, how can they do this !"
Although I guess it'll feel weird that the pawns will only have access to six vocations this time instead of....Wait they also had six. ...Nevermind then.
https://www.eurogamer.net/dragons-dogma-2-feels-like-a-perfect-second-try-at-the-original-but-could-the-isekai-theories-be-true
Very cut and dry, but Itsuno is terrible at communication since he also said stat allocation was like the first game which it absolutely is not.
yeah but why would they do this? I would be fine with 10 vocations, but not like that, you can't just tease us with a hybrid class of two non-existing classes. xd
This is single handily the choice that baffled me the most, there was not one second where I thought there was even a possibility there isn't going to be an advanced green and yellow.
When warfarer was shown my first thought was well we'll have 12 at minimum and maybe get the pink and purple as DLCs and maybe some more hybrids.