Character creation ruined - Minimum height is 160 cm/5 foot 3.

[deuxhero]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yv17QEjOUA&pp=ygUUaWduIGRyYWdvbidzIGRvZ21hIDI%3D

Capcom manages to ruin everything nowdays

[dirtshrimp]

Originally posted by RebelBuffoon:

Originally posted by Littlefatcat:

yeah we need to keep skimpy because the first game had them and barbarians wear less. Please educate yourself on Frank Frazetta's art and watch Fire and Ice and all the Conan films. I'd rather remove kids altogether and keep the loin cloth barbarian look than censor the clothes just so people can play as a child

My biggest problem is that most ppl just assume anyone making a small character wants to see children naked... You know that the Lolita Fashion is not, in fact, Sexual? its Victorian Era style fashion. the West as a very skewed sense of what the fashion actually is in Japan, and only hears what the Media wants them to hear. do your own research.

Yes, there are those in the subsection that are into lolicons, but that is like 10% of the population, at most.. some ppl genuinely just want to make small characters cause they want to relive their childhood, or cause they like the fashion, etc. but not all subscribe to sexualizing small or minor-looking characters. most, in fact, dont.

Yeah its weird for people to focus so intensely on the sexual aspect when most of the people complaining probably wanted to make dwarf or hobbit characters. Y'know from that book that inspired the entire fantasy genre...

But i guess we don't need those as long as we can play with our favorite twitch streamers!

[KingOfFriedChicken]

Originally posted by RebelBuffoon:

Originally posted by Littlefatcat:

yeah we need to keep skimpy because the first game had them and barbarians wear less. Please educate yourself on Frank Frazetta's art and watch Fire and Ice and all the Conan films. I'd rather remove kids altogether and keep the loin cloth barbarian look than censor the clothes just so people can play as a child

My biggest problem is that most ppl just assume anyone making a small character wants to see children naked... You know that the Lolita Fashion is not, in fact, Sexual? its Victorian Era style fashion. the West as a very skewed sense of what the fashion actually is in Japan, and only hears what the Media wants them to hear. do your own research.

Yes, there are those int he subsection that are into lolicons, but that is like 10% of the population, at most.. some ppl genuinely just want to make small characters cause they want to relive their childhood, or cause they like the fashion, etc. but not all subscribe to sexualizing small or minor-looking characters. most, in fact, dont.

It's a problem in any game that offers it, ffxiv? Lalafell are considered children, even though lore wise they are clearly adults and even have children cuz how populate? But just cuz smoll it's child, so some people immediately hate anyone who plays them, and the developers take action on anyone who is creepy they have wiped entire guilds of players who gather for creepy stuff.

But humans can't help it I guess, it's small adorable and it's some kind of internal parental protection of them I suppose? People jump to some crazy conclusions cuz smoll exist.

[Littlefatcat]

Originally posted by RebelBuffoon:

Originally posted by Littlefatcat:

yeah we need to keep skimpy because the first game had them and barbarians wear less. Please educate yourself on Frank Frazetta's art and watch Fire and Ice and all the Conan films. I'd rather remove kids altogether and keep the loin cloth barbarian look than censor the clothes just so people can play as a child

My biggest problem is that most ppl just assume anyone making a small character wants to see children naked... You know that the Lolita Fashion is not, in fact, Sexual? its Victorian Era style fashion. the West as a very skewed sense of what the fashion actually is in Japan, and only hears what the Media wants them to hear. do your own research.

Yes, there are those int he subsection that are into lolicons, but that is like 10% of the population, at most.. some ppl genuinely just want to make small characters cause they want to relive their childhood, or cause they like the fashion, etc. but not all subscribe to sexualizing small or minor-looking characters. most, in fact, dont.

Lolita is anime though. Whereas this is realistic/quasi-realistic. And yeah if you went to lolicon in japan you'd probably see a 40 year old woman in a loli costume because they are doing it for the vibe/aesthetic. Americans don't get it and thats why I like reading manga and watching anime more than american cartoons and comics. I agree with your argument though and it's why I don't agree with the removal of the small body in Blue Protocal. But here it seems like a more rational decision as it's more realistic looking and not lolita anime

[vaanomega]

Originally posted by KingOfFriedChicken:

Originally posted by RebelBuffoon:

My biggest problem is that most ppl just assume anyone making a small character wants to see children naked... You know that the Lolita Fashion is not, in fact, Sexual? its Victorian Era style fashion. the West as a very skewed sense of what the fashion actually is in Japan, and only hears what the Media wants them to hear. do your own research.

Yes, there are those int he subsection that are into lolicons, but that is like 10% of the population, at most.. some ppl genuinely just want to make small characters cause they want to relive their childhood, or cause they like the fashion, etc. but not all subscribe to sexualizing small or minor-looking characters. most, in fact, dont.

It's a problem in any game that offers it, ffxiv? Lalafell are considered children, even though lore wise they are clearly adults and even have children cuz how populate? But just cuz smoll it's child, so some people immediately hate anyone who plays them, and the developers take action on anyone who is creepy they have wiped entire guilds of players who gather for creepy stuff.

But humans can't help it I guess, it's small adorable and it's some kind of internal parental protection of them I suppose? People jump to some crazy conclusions cuz smoll exist.

Lol, i played a Lalafell in FF XIV... when it was the infamous 1.0 (i was still in middle school), i think this character might still exist, haven't played FF XIV in a long time

[TTV/RebelBuffoon]

Originally posted by Littlefatcat:

Originally posted by RebelBuffoon:

My biggest problem is that most ppl just assume anyone making a small character wants to see children naked... You know that the Lolita Fashion is not, in fact, Sexual? its Victorian Era style fashion. the West as a very skewed sense of what the fashion actually is in Japan, and only hears what the Media wants them to hear. do your own research.

Yes, there are those int he subsection that are into lolicons, but that is like 10% of the population, at most.. some ppl genuinely just want to make small characters cause they want to relive their childhood, or cause they like the fashion, etc. but not all subscribe to sexualizing small or minor-looking characters. most, in fact, dont.

Lolita is anime though. Whereas this is realistic/quasi-realistic. And yeah if you went to lolicon in japan you'd probably see a 40 year old woman in a loli costume because they are doing it for the vibe/aesthetic. Americans don't get it and thats why I like reading manga and watching anime more than american cartoons and comics. I agree with your argument though and it's why I don't agree with the removal of the small body in Blue Protocal. But here it seems like a more rational decision as it's more realistic looking and not lolita anime

Lolicon is anime, Lolita is not exclusively or generally. Lolita Fashion is genuinely Grown People dressing up in Victorian Era Children-style Clothing. At least predominantly. some do Maid outfits, others to more modernized inspired Styles of clothing, but its heavily inspired by the Vicotrian era stile. most of the Anime style stuff is sexualized, so its generally lumped in to the Lolicon. granted, there are exceptions but not many to my knowledge

[KingOfFriedChicken]

Originally posted by vaanomega:

Originally posted by KingOfFriedChicken:

It's a problem in any game that offers it, ffxiv? Lalafell are considered children, even though lore wise they are clearly adults and even have children cuz how populate? But just cuz smoll it's child, so some people immediately hate anyone who plays them, and the developers take action on anyone who is creepy they have wiped entire guilds of players who gather for creepy stuff.

But humans can't help it I guess, it's small adorable and it's some kind of internal parental protection of them I suppose? People jump to some crazy conclusions cuz smoll exist.

Lol, i played a Lalafell in FF XIV... when it was the infamous 1.0 (i was still in middle school), i think this character might still exist, haven't played FF XIV in a long time

It should in fact pre meteor characters to my understanding had a small gift nothing major lol for putting up with that crap

[Lungbutter]

After this comment, anyone who comments to this thread is a dummy

[Sel Und Irae]

Originally posted by Lungbutter:

After this comment, anyone who comments to this thread is a dummy

https://youtu.be/BwAzSuu_G0o

[Despiser]

Originally posted by deuxhero:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yv17QEjOUA&pp=ygUUaWduIGRyYWdvbidzIGRvZ21hIDI%3D

Capcom manages to ruin everything nowdays

People have so little to worry about these days. Life is good.

[Sel Und Irae]

Originally posted by Despiser:

Originally posted by deuxhero:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yv17QEjOUA&pp=ygUUaWduIGRyYWdvbidzIGRvZ21hIDI%3D

Capcom manages to ruin everything nowdays

People have so little to worry about these days. Life is good.

And then America Discovered Untapped Oil

[KingOfFriedChicken]

Originally posted by Lungbutter:

After this comment, anyone who comments to this thread is a dummy

Hmmmm interesting indeed 🤔

[Evangela]

Aren't people being double standards about this? There's a huge furry character creation option in this game, and you people have no issue about it. But hell no people shouldn't make a short human character.

If you claim that it's bad for people to like short character, because you think it's related to the real world issues, then why you allow furry? It's also illegal in the real world to have such relationship with animals.

[KingOfFriedChicken]

Originally posted by Evangela:

Aren't people being double standards about this? There's a huge furry character creation option in this game, and you people have no issue about it. But hell no people shouldn't make a short human character.

If you claim that it's bad for people to like short character, because you think it's related to the real world issues, then why you allow furry? It's also illegal in the real world to have such relationship with animals.

It's illegal to form a battle bond with animals thru warring and kinship only forged in the fires of a dragons breath in the real world? Hmmmm interesting!

[VDRSK]

Originally posted by Evangela:

If you claim that it's bad for people to like short character, because you think it's related to the real world issues, then why you allow furry? It's also illegal in the real world to have such relationship with animals.

Because beastren in all respects other then appearance are human-like. Intellect is usually the deciding factor for whether something is legal, kids do not have a fully developed mind, animals (non-human ones) aren't smart enough to and can't verbalise, and in some countries there are laws against having intercourse with people with issues that limit their mental capacity even if they consent.

[CadaveR]

Originally posted by Evangela:

Aren't people being double standards about this? There's a huge furry character creation option in this game, and you people have no issue about it. But hell no people shouldn't make a short human character.

If you claim that it's bad for people to like short character, because you think it's related to the real world issues, then why you allow furry? It's also illegal in the real world to have such relationship with animals.

People like to complain