Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Its not about have or not the right to play, of course we know we dont need to play it if we dont want its obvious isnt? The fact here is feedback, we like the game and we do care, this is why we need to make these developers know what we are thinking about the product. Cant you understand this? Its about say what we didnt like in it. If we dont even have interest in this game, clearly we wont be here complaining. You only complain about what you care becouse you want it better.
Very compelling argument. 5 cents have been deposited into your capc*ck account.
elden ring looks like a PS3 game i know back in 2012 call Dragon's Dogma
This is a worse take than OP's. You've clearly forgotten what games from that generation look like, lmao
This, I fully agree with Kappe.
TO Fanboys: just look at 0:14 in DD2 video, the npc have his head shattered ahahaha. How is this good? You can see the grass looking like paper, lack of shadows on npcs and a "Plastic" appearance they have. How is this good? Stop fanatsim please, deal with reality, dd2 graphics are crap for a new gen game.