引用自 Sr. Tequila：

引用自 vizthex：

1 and 0 definitely need a remake. The fixed camera makes them damn near impossible to play.

Seems like skill issue to me. Those games are still perfectly playable for anyone with working thumbs and the gamecube remake of Resident Evil 1 is an all time classic.

k well i wasn't referring to the movement, just the camera angle and i was barely alive when the gamecube came out. It's just annoying af to see and function in. Movement is fine, but navigating the world becomes a needless pain and ends up making the game unfun.

not everyone is some 30+ year old long-time fan. I got into the series over the summer sale, for example.

引用自 artemis：

10 bucks for story dlc when we regularly pay 70 dollars for triple a botched releases smh
stop whining

this game was $60 and from what i heard, functioned perfectly fine on release. Granted, I didn't get it until July - but i heard all about it when it came out and can't recall anyone bringing up random crashes or bugs or what have you that other triple A games have, so it's kind of a non-issue to complain about imo.

The inclusion of the VR trailer on here gave me hope for a minute. Very sad news that it's once again only for Playstation :/

引用自 Metroplexmaster：

引用自 Dakota：

gotta love how they keep removing content from these remakes and now sell it as dlc lol

capcom has really become one of those ♥♥♥♥♥♥ overly greedy companies with all the bs dlc unlocks and other things to squeeze every dollar out of the game

of course people will keep defending (and buying ) these things as well and so we will keep getting ♥♥♥♥ like the weapon upgrade tickets and unlock everything dlcs ....plus weapons and outfits which used to be neat things you could unlock in the resident evil series but now they wanna sell you more than what you can unlock

its just sad because I'm not trying to be a hater but a company and games I used to love have just become a vehicle to sell you more crap

Crybaby time:

he's right about selling the weapons and being able to unlock everything (kinda defeats the point of the game imo. Good on repeat playthroughs though, but you shouldn't be able to buy a "win faster" DLC for your first time through).

but yeah, really being a crybaby otherwise. I don't understand why people always whine about the concept of DLC. Yeah, a lot of it bloats your stats while being somewhat pointless (like every damn costume in the Borderlands games) it gets really annoying - but you can also use it to deliver even more content to a series people love without having to make an entire new game. A lot of indie devs have started doing that (like Risk of Rain 2) and even some triple A devs do it (like that Elden Ring one I keep hearing about, a lot of the Borderlands story DLCs, and the very one we're discussing here).

I do agree that it's kind of annoying most of the time though - for example, when I bought the Handsome Jack collection it inflated my DLC count way higher. Recently bought Pandora's Box and it further inflated my DLC count with a bunch of cosmetics i don't really care about. Tad annoying, but ultimately not that big a deal (most of the time).

ok if ur wondering why we dont get VR mode, its bc Sony paid for it to push PSVR2. Preydog will be most likely be releasing the PCVR mode in RE Framework AFTER the VR update is released on PS5.

"Ahhh, I'll buy it at a high price..."
"He hehe he, thank you!"

I don't think you can really compare this to the original separate ways. It was a different distribution model back then. Separate ways was "free" because they made it for the PS2, you didn't just get it for free if you already had it on Gamecube, you needed to buy the PS2 version. Everything after that included it yes, but consider that future "GOTY edition" type packages of RE4R will probably also contain Separate Ways. I can guarantee that if OG RE4 was made during the DLC model was prevalent instead of prior to the DLC era, Separate Ways would have been a DLC. Instead they made it a bonus for Sony players to get the game, and an incentive to Gamecube players who might get a PS2 to buy the game again. Basically, it wasn't "free" content, they already found ways to fund its existence by selling the game on newer systems, which you could also cynically ♥♥♥♥ on by calling it "rehashing". Separate ways wasn't paid DLC because the PS2 was not advanced enough to support a function like downloadable DLC, nor was the Gamecube.

You can't really say that they are now charging for content that was free, because Separate WaysR is not Separate ways, it's a new story mode they developed for RE4R, so it's not the same content. If you think that Separate WaysR should be free you should also argue that RE4R should be free if you already own any version of original RE4, anything else is logically inconsistent.

引用自 MS-06S ZAKU II：

I don't think you can really compare this to the original separate ways. It was a different distribution model back then. Separate ways was "free" because they made it for the PS2, you didn't just get it for free if you already had it on Gamecube, you needed to buy the PS2 version. Everything after that included it yes, but consider that future "GOTY edition" type packages of RE4R will probably also contain Separate Ways. I can guarantee that if OG RE4 was made during the DLC model was prevalent instead of prior to the DLC era, Separate Ways would have been a DLC. Instead they made it a bonus for Sony players to get the game, and an incentive to Gamecube players who might get a PS2 to buy the game again. Basically, it wasn't "free" content, they already found ways to fund its existence by selling the game on newer systems, which you could also cynically ♥♥♥♥ on by calling it "rehashing". Separate ways wasn't paid DLC because the PS2 was not advanced enough to support a function like downloadable DLC, nor was the Gamecube.

You can't really say that they are now charging for content that was free, because Separate WaysR is not Separate ways, it's a new story mode they developed for RE4R, so it's not the same content. If you think that Separate WaysR should be free you should also argue that RE4R should be free if you already own any version of original RE4, anything else is logically inconsistent.

yeah, as far as i know all future ports of RE4 were based on the PS2 version (probably cuz it was the latest release, and most likely the least buggy).

not to mention that this version would've cost a lot more to develop than the PS2 one, so giving it away for free is kind of dumb.

but i'm sure the reader is asking "but what about the mercenaries?!" - but that released a month later, and as far as i know it's a popular minigame (though i haven't played it). Perhaps it was planned from the start and had to be delayed for whatever reason, and maybe the same happened to Separate Ways.

It's great being an adult with disposable income.

i can finally 100% the game

AGAIN

引用自 özdemirler：

Price?

9.9box

引用自 the gash gnasher：

i can finally 100% the game

AGAIN

pog.

been trying to do that, but had to stop playing due to the heatwave (and kinda didn't wanna since the 7 WIP achievements have been haunting me since i got the game back in July. Still not sure why Capcom put them on the live branch...)

glhf to both of us lol

nice perfect games list btw

FOCKING AMAZING! Can't wait!!!

ADA IS COMING MOTHER IS ARRVING!!!

Wonder if Ada can access to a new type of Crossbow... (¡Gloria a las plagas!)