Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I don't care about a remake, i would just be happy with a pc port with online capabilities. Outbreak was the best ps2 title after re4.
It failed and killed outbreak.
this is a joke response right?
Their priority is remaking the mainline games and new ones.
Or have you seen them remaking Code Veronica? Survivor? Revelations?
They better learn how to tackle, how to dodge, how to switch item on the ground with their inventory, leave blue herb for George, knifing certain dangerous room for future transversal, don't waste ammo on immortal Nyx boss, and most importantly, don't snatch my favorite burst handgun in scenario Showdown 3.
For those that don't know. The Outbreak games were a real 4 player online co-op Resident Evil game. Not some silly side mode. No Horde mode or PvP bullcrap. It was a full Resident Evil experience but with 4 player co-op. And this years before Left 4 Dead even existed.
your excuses arent a good enough reason for outbreak to not get a remaster/remake
Don't blame me, I bought both of them despite living in Europe and forced to play only with the bots