Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
I liked the tension of 2. I liked having limited saves and tiny inventory and needing to decide whether or not a zombie was worth spending ammo on. I liked all the backtracking and constant feeling of danger. But most of that disappeared once you left the police station (~3-4 hours in), at which point it became a decent-but-not-stellar action game.
4 is just good from start to finish, and it's a lot better value for money. It's not really a survival horror game, just a third-person shooter with horror themes. It's not nearly as unique and innovative as RE1/2 were (and the remake managed to recapture that magic). But if you're looking for a Gears of War/Uncharted style game you can't go wrong there.
With that said, RE2 remake felt more polished visually. It's been a while so maybe I just forgot or maybe standards weren't as high at the time, but I feel like RE4 remake is visually inferior. It's still the better game though. The combat and management are the best in the series, and while the police station part in RE2 is fine, the game dips afterwards. Most resident evil games actually follow this weird "let's just have the last part of the game in some kind of research center for no reason" and it's almost always the weakest section, I don't know why they stick with the formula
RE2R is great, loved it and I would say I prefer my Resident Evil games to fit more alongside that one, give me more survival horror than action horror. That being said, RE4R just has a lot going on, a lot of variety, a lot of good gameplay and action, good, fun, story, and we'll be getting Mercenaries soon, so it's just a damn good game I want to keep coming back to play.
I also feel like RE4R is reeeeally demanding for the quality I've seen from it.
I really dislike stalker enemies in games, and I kinda hated Mr. X. The sewers were annoying. Not looking to replay 2 anytime soon, I think. Maybe to finally complete Claire B, but that's it.
4 though ? I finished it yesterday and I'm itching to replay it with me being used to the combat now, with a completely different set of weapons, on a higher difficulty, with costumes on and the OG soundtrack. There aren't any parts of it that are so annoying I dread replaying them.
That's where it kind of depends because the enemies tanking a ton of damage in the RE2R and RE3R was shoe horned into RE4R for some reason. RE4R was the first game where we played a character who had prior experience with what was going on. He was in multiple outbreaks in both RE2 and Darkside Chronicles. Shooting some random villager in Spain with an entire clip of pistol bullets and them sometimes still surviving is like... Why? Why are they trying so hard to turn RE4R into another running simulator with puzzles?
So I'd have to say... In terms of the plot and nostalgia RE4R is great. HOWEVER... Since the remake is trying to make the RE4R into the RE2R I'd say RE2R is better. If the RE4R wants to be a running simulator like RE2R then they obviously didn't have anything new to bring to the table and thus the RE2R is the foundation that the RE4R is trying to stay afloat with.
If they embraced the fact this game was meant to be action based and not "run from every fight or die looking like an idiot with no ammo" it would easily be the best of the remakes.
What ?