Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.mobygames.com/game/12847/resident-evil/
Do you think these are the same game?
I got into the RE series late and lacked knowledge. I only knew of an HD remaster, assuming it was a remaster of the original, not of a remake.
I am glad lack of knowledge amuses and/or triggers people. Rather than making a logical conclusion "you are misinformed, your assumption abc is wrong; actually xyz is correct" people respond with contempt. Pretty weird.
The wiki lists both the original 1996 version and the 2002 gamecube remake.
Second entry leads to https://residentevil.fandom.com/wiki/Typewriter where a footnote says "In Resident Evil Remake and Resident Evil 4, the typewriters have the word "Amenhotep" engraved in gold letters."
That's it. That's what I based my post on, plus my own misinformation that the Resident Evil game in my library that I bought 5 or so years ago is advertised as “The game that defined the survival-horror genre is back! Check out the remastered HD version of Resident Evil." assuming it's a remaster (not remake) of the OG.
Pretty bold and irrational of you to assume I would straight up just rewrite history or deny the reality of two separate games existing rather than just neutrally acknowledging "you are misinformed. There is actually a RE1 remake." Like why is it more likely to you that I want to deny the existence of two separate games as you assumed I read that there are in fact two separate games, rather than conclude that I had wrong information?
Not sure why to respond to a wrong assumption with a question that has an obvious answer rather than correcting the wrong assumption. It's not constructive in any way.
If I go to the store looking for bananas and ask the clerk why they don't have any bananas and the clerk comes back with a banana holding it 'does this not look like a banana to you?' rather than saying 'oh but we do, you must have missed them, they are right here' as one would assume that I know what a banana looks like and it's a useless question.