60 Hz vs 120 Hz?

[jarrettf18]

So far I’ve just been running on 60 and for the most part it feels pretty smooth. For anyone who runs at 120, is there a huge difference with this game? Obviously, 30 is completely non playable for me personally, so I was curious if the diff between 30 and 60 is just as big as a jump between 60 and 120? Thanks.

[👱🏻‍♀️ ❤]

It’s all the same my dudette. I played just fine with 20fps back in the day

[Pulsing]

Definitely a difference. 30 to 60 is a big jump alone but there is still quite a noticeable jump from 60hz to 120hz, Gameplay feels crisper smoother and more responsive.

[jarrettf18]

Pulsing の投稿を引用：

Definitely a difference. 30 to 60 is a big jump alone but there is still quite a noticeable jump from 60hz to 120hz, Gameplay feels crisper smoother and more responsive.

Awesome. Thank you :)

[cha0tic]

I usually shoot for 90 fps locked on single player games like this. Give that a try.

[erazerhead99]

120 feels ok to me, but definetely not as good as 165, which i usually play action games in, but RE4 wont hold a stalbe 165 for me. 60 is unplayable IMO with a game with moderately fast movements like RE4.

But i suppose it's heavily subjective.

[Dante]

I also play 144 fps at 2k, honestly i prefer litle bit fps than visuals but a can play at 2k 144fps. But yeah is better for me 120fps than 60fps in ultra and if you change 60 to 120fps you will notice a big change for sure.

[Powellinho.72]

VP of Durdom (ИО) の投稿を引用：

It’s all the same my dudette. I played just fine with 20fps back in the day

60 and 120 definitely isnt the same lol.

[DetonadosFullGames]

120 Hz is Better

[Adhihuheho]

yep 120Hz Better

[Limygeorge]

I hard lock in the NVCP at 85fps so it sticks there with max graphics. For me that's fine in this game. Some folks are really sensitive to it others not so much. It is kind of subjective.

But, yeah, the difference between 30fps and 60 fps is huge. 120fps will be better than than 60fps, but some folks it will be a huge difference.

I settled for a rock steady 85fps, which is half my monitors 170Hz refresh.
After reading the comments here I'll give 120fps a go. Probably have to turn down a couple settings though?

Older games (Doom 2016 for instance) can run maxed at 167fps (just below max refresh as I use G-Sync.) Come to think of it Doom is extremely fluid and smooth. Think I will try 120fps.

[Kayits]

For me, 120-144hz are the perfect setup for every game. Should try it, you will find out how ''smooth'' it is in difference to 60hz

[Ashley]

Visually, there is a very noticeable difference. It's like going from 30 to 60.
In terms of responsiveness, not really. The game was made with 30 fps in mind and is therefore sluggish by design. Those extra frames will do very little (the only thing I can think of are perfect parries).

If your hardware can't handle 120, and you're using a controller (!), you can lock the game to 60 and use an external frame generator. It will look like 120 but play like 60.

[Slave K***ht Gael]

"30fps is unplayable" is so damn goofy

[Bansheebutt]

I set to 120hz but use the option to cap the game at 60fps, so I get much less mouse latency without wildly variable fps.

[Seamus]

Bansheebutt の投稿を引用：

I set to 120hz but use the option to cap the game at 60fps, so I get much less mouse latency without wildly variable fps.

Set framerate to variable and cap your frame rate externally with rtss/nvidia control panel/etc.

The in game limiter has terrible frame pacing.