For people who agree with Crowbcat's video

[Beblin]

I just wanna say especially for those people who lack some critical thinking that it's not hard to play both games and then draw your own conclusions instead of blatantly believing what Crowbcat trying to show in his lame edited video. He is pushing his false narrative and it works, because more clicks mean more money for his YouTube channel. Resident Evil 4 Remake is really trending right now so why not do it, right?

Nevertheless, the video itself didn't communicate well and it wasn't clear what he was trying to show there. Showing false comparisons and fooling his audience in such a pathetic way. Such as skipping the full intro scene with Leon in the car and Ganado. Same for the Regenerator, which he literally ignored the whole intro lab part. I can name so much more. He blatantly lies about the audio, deleting YouTube comments, and changing the title with the description of his video back and forth like a coward.

Both games have their own strengths and weaknesses and different direction, which doesn't mean "new game bad old game good reee". And speaking of people ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ RE4 Remake, those are the same RE "purists" who bashed the original Resident Evil 4 when it was released in 2004 for abandoning the classic survival horror and fixed camera angles and the game was labeled as "the death of a series". Now suddenly the same people think that the RE4 Original is their masterpiece and treat every other RE game as some kind of pile of ♥♥♥♥ for not replicating the same nostalgic experience. They are just a bunch of hypocrites who push the narrative and you monks follow them like some buggy NPCs. Play those games and compare them by yourselves. I love both games, but there's no need to insult other people because of this game or that game.

Crowbcat could have done the exact same video about RE3 Remake which is the most soulless Remake ever. He didn't even bother to make a video about Fallout 76, Battlefield 2042 or even GTA Trilogy Remastered...

Just think for yourselves.

[Han Daimond]

Автор сообщения: -アリツサ-

Автор сообщения: Han Daimond

97% Positive reviews say otherwise.

Steam reviews where Steam can ban reviews when the publisher contacts them?
Metacritic has a 5.0 user score.

There's 3% mixed/negative reviews remaining, I guess they're gonna be silenced?

Автор сообщения: -アリツサ-

Автор сообщения: Han Daimond

You seriously must be trolling. You cannot judge an entire game from the demo.
The og also had missing content if you put it into perspective; it didn't have parries, you couldn't swap weapons on the fly, you didn't have more time with Luis as your follower, couldn't know more about the lore during the game, couldn't properly fight Krawser during the knife fight. But sure, "cUt CoNtEnT, bAd gAmE".

Ur the damn troll. RE4 was a complete overhaul from the previous three main titles.
Something the RE4R isnt from RE2R. Plays and looks the same. The same p1ss poor lighting. Where even open lighted areas feel you are always in somesort of underground with limited lightning. But ofc nothing to wonder when the damn same engine is used.

That "damn same engine" is a godsend for Capcom and it showed how efficient it is.
You really want them to remain stranded with MT Framework?
And both RE2 and RE4 play differently, you're simply insane if you think otherwise.

Автор сообщения: -アリツサ-

Автор сообщения: Han Daimond

Uhmm DEAD SPACE?
See? Haters cannot think.

Gongraz your only debate is another "remake" from an older game. Amazed that you didnt say Call of Duty

My "only" debate? You just said there were really NO good AAA game competition on the market as a fact, I just mentioned one good AAA game (and another excellent horror survival remake) and that's your response? I could've even mentioned Hi-Fi Rush or Dredge, but I've chosen an obvious one.
And of course, there comes the "lol call of duty" card when you have nothing else to say to backup your nonsense.

Thanks for confirming.
Haters. Cannot. THINK.

[Beblin]

Автор сообщения: -アリツサ-

Автор сообщения: Beblin

Also, a fun fact that every precious little game out there uses either Unreal or Unity. So according to your logic, every game is essentially "a different overpaint" because it uses the same engine?

Yeah and thats why majority of their games look utter trash today when compared to games that use their own internal engines like lets say Metal Gear Solid V

You know Renderware was the main game engine back in the early 2000s, right? GTA, Burnout, NFS, Spongebob, and so on. A game engine doesn't mean that a game will become bad it's up to developers how they utilize their tools and their knowledge. Forgot Mass Affect Andromeda, Anthem? So to say their internal engine such as Frostbite wasn't utilized properly by developers. A game engine is just a tool.

[Han Daimond]

Автор сообщения: Beblin

Автор сообщения: Han Daimond

lmao "solid evidence", he altered the sound volume to over-exaggerate the differences, the remake *HAS* clear ambient sound.
But then again, you're that troll who cannot stop bashing the game, so what would you know.

Lol not only altered but carefully cherry-picked clips.

And he stated that it was a "one-sided comparison mostly about art & cinematic direction", by adding Ashley's reaction to Leon peeking at her panties.

It's truly one of Crowbcat's videos of all time.

[Sexy Salesman]

Автор сообщения: Shep

You're clearly talking out your ass and know nothing about the games on a technical level, so just stop embarrassing yourself with this asinine "sAmE eNgInE" argument.

Youre the one who is talking out of his ass "GmanLives review is fair" when the guy got a review copy and praises it like its the second coming of christ. Thats game journalism right there. But when someone dares to critizise it he clearly doesent know what he is talking about. You are also an idiot it seems when mentioning GmanLives in the first place.

[Beblin]

Автор сообщения: Han Daimond

Автор сообщения: Beblin

Lol not only altered but carefully cherry-picked clips.

And he stated that it was a "one-sided comparison mostly about art & cinematic direction", by adding Ashley's reaction to Leon peeking at her panties.

It's truly one of Crowbcat's videos of all time.

ObSeRvE AnD DrAw yOuR OwN CoNcLuSiOnS. Sure the video didn't push the narrative. This time he really dropped the ball, he had so many other fiascos to choose from instead.

[Draza]

Автор сообщения: Beblin

Автор сообщения: Han Daimond

And he stated that it was a "one-sided comparison mostly about art & cinematic direction", by adding Ashley's reaction to Leon peeking at her panties.

It's truly one of Crowbcat's videos of all time.

ObSeRvE AnD DrAw yOuR OwN CoNcLuSiOnS. Sure the video didn't push the narrative. This time he really dropped the ball, he had so many other fiascos to choose from instead.

He usually targets games that are already hated or going through a major controversy (because its easy to do a nothing video when everybody already agrees with it before you even make it), so I wonder if he went after RE4R because he believed that the whole "soulless!!" BS surrounding it was the majority opinion instead of a loud minority and thought everyone would agree with him once again.

[Shep]

Автор сообщения: -アリツサ-

Автор сообщения: Shep

You're clearly talking out your ass and know nothing about the games on a technical level, so just stop embarrassing yourself with this asinine "sAmE eNgInE" argument.

Youre the one who is talking out of his ass "GmanLives review is fair" when the guy got a review copy and praises it like its the second coming of christ. Thats game journalism right there. But when someone dares to critizise it he clearly doesent know what he is talking about. You are also an idiot it seems when mentioning GmanLives in the first place.

Who's the idiot here? You clearly didn't even watch it if you think he spent the entire runtime blindly praising the game, and not giving it any measured analysis or critique.

I didn't even mention his review lmao, I referenced the video he posted of both games with balanced audio levels, because it's a far more fair soundscape comparison than Crowbcat's pathetic 40-minute cherry-picking session.

But go ahead and scoot those goalposts a little further, since you can't even address my argument so far.

[Sexy Salesman]

Автор сообщения: Han Daimond

That "damn same engine" is a godsend for Capcom and it showed how efficient it is.
You really want them to remain stranded with MT Framework?
And both RE2 and RE4 play differently, you're simply insane if you think otherwise.

I said RE2R and RE4R play the same. Learn to read first.

Автор сообщения: Han Daimond

My "only" debate? You just said there were really NO good AAA game competition on the market as a fact, I just mentioned one good AAA game (and another excellent horror survival remake) and that's your response? I could've even mentioned Hi-Fi Rush or Dredge, but I've chosen an obvious one.
And of course, there comes the "lol call of duty" card when you have nothing else to say to backup your nonsense.
Thanks for confirming.
Haters. Cannot. THINK.

Hi-Fi Rush and Dredge look more like indie games than actual triple A titles. Seriously even a actual indie title like The Long Dark looks better.

[Sexy Salesman]

Автор сообщения: Shep

Автор сообщения: -アリツサ-

Youre the one who is talking out of his ass "GmanLives review is fair" when the guy got a review copy and praises it like its the second coming of christ. Thats game journalism right there. But when someone dares to critizise it he clearly doesent know what he is talking about. You are also an idiot it seems when mentioning GmanLives in the first place.

Who's the idiot here? You clearly didn't even watch it if you think he spent the entire runtime blindly praising the game, and not giving it any measured analysis or critique.

I didn't even mention his review lmao, I referenced the video he posted of both games with balanced audio levels, because it's a far more fair soundscape comparison than Crowbcat's pathetic 40-minute cherry-picking session.

But go ahead and scoot those goalposts a little further, since you can't even address my argument so far.

Big difference getting a review copy or buying the game and the criticizing it dumbass.

[Draza]

Автор сообщения: -アリツサ-

Автор сообщения: Han Daimond

That "damn same engine" is a godsend for Capcom and it showed how efficient it is.
You really want them to remain stranded with MT Framework?
And both RE2 and RE4 play differently, you're simply insane if you think otherwise.

I said RE2R and RE4R play the same. Learn to read first.

He's clearly answering that in the thing you're directly quoting, are you okay?

[Shep]

Автор сообщения: -アリツサ-

Автор сообщения: Shep

Who's the idiot here? You clearly didn't even watch it if you think he spent the entire runtime blindly praising the game, and not giving it any measured analysis or critique.

I didn't even mention his review lmao, I referenced the video he posted of both games with balanced audio levels, because it's a far more fair soundscape comparison than Crowbcat's pathetic 40-minute cherry-picking session.

But go ahead and scoot those goalposts a little further, since you can't even address my argument so far.

Big difference getting a review copy or buying the game and the criticizing it dumbass.

Jesus, you're dense. But go ahead, keep those goalposts a-moving, since you clearly have nothing meaningful to discuss and just want to sling ♥♥♥♥ at anyone who disagrees.

[Sexy Salesman]

Isnt the whole topic directed at disagreeing it with Crowbcats video?
Im disagreeing that you disagree with him simple as that.

[Han Daimond]

Автор сообщения: -アリツサ-

Автор сообщения: Han Daimond

That "damn same engine" is a godsend for Capcom and it showed how efficient it is.
You really want them to remain stranded with MT Framework?
And both RE2 and RE4 play differently, you're simply insane if you think otherwise.

I said RE2R and RE4R play the same. Learn to read first.

I WAS REFERRING TO THOSE GAMES ALREADY. THE REMAKES.
Learn to follow a conversation first.

Автор сообщения: -アリツサ-

Автор сообщения: Han Daimond

My "only" debate? You just said there were really NO good AAA game competition on the market as a fact, I just mentioned one good AAA game (and another excellent horror survival remake) and that's your response? I could've even mentioned Hi-Fi Rush or Dredge, but I've chosen an obvious one.
And of course, there comes the "lol call of duty" card when you have nothing else to say to backup your nonsense.
Thanks for confirming.
Haters. Cannot. THINK.

Hi-Fi Rush and Dredge look more like indie games than actual triple A titles. Seriously even a actual indie title like The Long Dark looks better.

That's why I didn't even bother to mention them, even though Hi-Fi Rush was developed by a AAA studio owned by no other than Microsoft. I would've hoped you would be satisfied with just Dead Space, but nope, your tiny brain couldn't accept it.

I'm going to block you man, you're not worth any other reply.

[Beblin]

Автор сообщения: Shep

Автор сообщения: -アリツサ-

Big difference getting a review copy or buying the game and the criticizing it dumbass.

Jesus, you're dense. But go ahead, keep those goalposts a-moving, since you clearly have nothing meaningful to discuss and just want to sling ♥♥♥♥ at anyone who disagrees.

Just don't waste your time with this person. He has no idea what he's talking about and doesn't know how to follow a discussion.

[Beblin]

Автор сообщения: -アリツサ-

Isnt the whole topic directed at disagreeing it with Crowbcats video?
Im disagreeing that you disagree with him simple as that.

That's all I want to know. Thank you very much! Wish you a pleasant day!