Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I have mentioned like 10 times already, but Capcom should learn from RE2R.
EDIT: Except they should find a better face model for Claire, I guess. I don't like the look of nuClaire and nuJill.
It has a TON of problems.
And while RE2 has problems (not so much from what I play), it's probably the true-est RE since, I dunno, Code Veronica or REmake.
I really enjoyed RE4, but it felt more like a fancy coat of paint (albeit a good game) and continuation of a line of remakes rather than a passionate or necessary one.
The only thing I dislike about RE2R, and other REs in general is the intentional nuking of the combat. RE4's combat was excellent, and has influenced countless games. I never understood the decision to revert back to generic combat with bullet sponge enemies. The ones in the originals were due to technological limitations and general age of the game, not because they were superior