Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But people will bring up games where denuvo "affected" the fps, so you go look it up and the only reason it got affected was due to that game having two DRMs, their own and denuvo and it conflicted.
But on 4/5 year old hardware if it was pretty high end like a 1070 and a cpu around as good as a ryzen 7 4.5ghz 8core and 16gb ram. you will get solid fps. 55 on average at 85% of 1440p with fsr quality on. At high/max settings (shadows medium). Only time it drops is likely 100% cuz of the game.
Rain needs to be optimized better I think for anyone this ruins fps.
And the scope I feel like the scope renders two images, the scope image and then your normal image. dROPS 10 to 20% of your fps lul.
other than that the game is pretty well optimized, all of the RE remakes and reboots are well optimized for the most part.
But yeah denuvo in most cases will not affect fps, and if it does its a very tiny amount that you wouldnt notice. People always say theres proof it affects fps but there isnt really proof. theres far more proof that it doesnt affect fps.
And again, yes some times in rare cases denuvo can affect fps.
But in a vast majority it wont, the people that think so are like tin hat people. they "know a guy of a guy who says it affects fps so obviously its true!"
and they need to realize correlation is not causation.
no one bats an eye when the games that run good have denuvo, and most new games that are AAA and even AA run like doodoo very often and some have denuvo and obviously its some how denuvos fault.
Then theyll do an optimization patch itll run better, no one says anything. then a few patches after that optimization patch denuvo gets removed, and everyone says it was denuvo that made it run bad. While ignoring the game had several optimization patches lmao.
I think a lot of people have some problem with their PC and suddenly the game is to blame.
My cousin owns a 11900k with an RTX 3070 ti and doesn't experience all the performance or stability issues that the people write about on Steam
problems https://imgur.com/a/r1IUxZ2
You're joking, right? The 3060 Is 3 yo and Is not a card from High End system.
A 3080 12 GB could be
Now, I'm no expert here, but I'm going to assume people saying the game is tanking their performance are either jacking up the resolution and thinking "high end" means they can just max everything out and they should be buttery smooth (which is hardly ever the case) or they've managed to bottleneck themselves with high end GPU's and lower end CPU's, which sometimes is the case.
2/3 years maximum? Yeah no. It runs good on older than that, if it's not a jump in hardware from that time.
You are correct though, the game has the same specs needed to run Village. I think that’s why a lot of people are confused by certain stuttering etc.
We need hardware with 2 3 years??Sure lololol
Plus, I've seen just as many people getting trouble with brand new high end rigs as they do with slightly older ones.
Also, if it really was just people having old computers being the problem, then explain why I could play the Demo at max settings, but get non-stop stuttering with the main game at lowest settings. Plus, it's the exact same amount of stuttering at max settings as at the lowest settings. That's not a rig issue, that's an optimization issue. It just needs a patch, and making the problems known is part of how you make a company fix an issue.