Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Why are there so many female leaders.
The non-binary woman leaders look appalling.
It’s an alt history game.
Though i see what you are saying, zero of these people are lower echelon and all achieved a lot or were (in)famous. Most of the leaders if not all have a many of those qualities you say.
You can also win this game without a hyperfocus on expansion and domination.
Being able to tweak or fully customize leaders would be a very welcome change.
I also agree that leaders need more unique aspects (buildings/units/abilities/etc.) to actually make games play differently. Right now, some leaders are just objectively worse than others.
There are no non-binary leaders in the game, to my knowledge.
This is a really interesting idea. Noted! Thanks for posting!