Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
New game, turn 40 and Byzantine was nowhere near me, in the 'green' on the trust scale, and then did the infinite war (don't know what it's called). Like...wtf. I know in 4x games having a standing military is important, but can I just get my cities settled and a barebones economy established before I apparently have to build 200 spearmen and archers?!
That worked for me, yes a substantial part of my economy has to be put in military to keep the peace ;-)
Also depends on your neighbors. Some nations like to cuddle and others like to destroy everything in their path.
At prince and above you also have to pay attention to keeping your units up to date. Unfortunately we don't have an option to upgrade units yet so you're kind of forced to disband old armies if your near your force limit.
Ok, so this is echoing what I'm feeling - thanks for that. I have been playing on Prince, and yeah for all the talk I see in forums about it being Anno, or an economy simulator - the game is nothing but military and war from my experience for the first third it seems.
I was hoping that not every single game wouldn't need to have this hyper focus on military at the start, but it seems that no matter what, you have to do it.
I definitely am not a fan of this focus, but I can respect if that was by design and it's just not for me.
Thanks for the great comments all!