Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文（簡体字中国語）
繁體中文（繁体字中国語）
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština（チェコ語）
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia（インドネシア語）
Magyar（ハンガリー語）
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português（ポルトガル語－ポルトガル）
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română（ルーマニア語）
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
ルールとガイドライン
この投稿を報告する
My country of origin is the United States.
Unfortunately EAC forbids using windows test signing mode. Test signing mode allows running of non-signed drivers which makes it easier for hackers try to bypass EAC.
There really shouldn't be any reason to use test signing mode since Windows has enforced the policy of signed drivers since Windows Vista. Please check from your hardware vendors website if they have released signed drivers.
Or if you have some really specific driver that does not have signed driver, please link the download link for that driver to this thread. In situations like this we will go through these case by case.
For the custom kernel:
Unfortunately this is not supported by Microsoft and not supported by EAC. Please note, that if you use such custom workarounds for Windows it will cause problems with EAC (and possibly with other software also). If you want to play EAC protected games you need to have the test signing mode disabled.
Easiest way to do it is "dual boot":
You can create a "dual boot" which means that using bcdedit you can create a boot menu for Windows that has two boot options for the same operating system. Other one is using test signing and other one is not. Then you can just select on boot for which one to use.
You state there shouldn't be ANY reason to use test signing mode and yet I can give you plenty. Hardware that is out of support and has invalid-non-working drivers from their official sources, such as several Asus Sonar audio cards, third party joystick-to-usb adapters, PSX Webcams, etc. You're telling us to take the greatest functionality of windows, which is multitasking and compartmentalize it into what DOS used to be. You boot up your computer to play a game, then reboot to get back into Windows. Is there any reason you can't just disable the rudimentary check that EAC does and respect gamers choices, even the ones on tight budgets? I know it takes a lot of work to make a viable product but to pass that around as "Microsoft doesn't support.." Well guess what, Microsoft doesn't support a lot of things, surprisingly, they don't support EAC, they don't support anything that's not developed by them, period. If you think these gaming customers are dumb enough to believe that because Microsoft doesn't support something that it shouldn't happen, then I've got a copy of Farcry 6 to sell you.
For you to repeatedly pass this rhetoric around shows you don't understand anything about what you're discussing and that you come from marketing or some other department that has only a flow chart to go by.
Gabe Newel explained why they do not try to invade kernel space. If what you're requiring us to do is to disable a feature that's there to assist users in our exact position and not blocking off Windows XP users, your message is essentially telling real cheaters to do the easy thing and use XP for those incredibly rare driver based cheats since you still support it and doesn't have driver signing.
What also astounds me is that your product has so far caught far more players using their OS properly, not in the most secure way, but UAC by default is even less secure by leagues than this. I personally think that for what you offer it's become much more of a problem and less of a solution. In Robocraft while working my way up to Tier9, I might see a cheater in one out of every 10 games. Most of the time it was a rail gunner using cheat engine to force the clip to never be empty, never saw the 'fabled' fire breathing rapid fire plasma launcher, but ultimately I had few problems. While the rail gunners would rapid fire their weapons, it amounted to having no accuracy except up close and within 3 meters. I was still able to beat them just through smart thinking, keeping them at a distance, hiding around corners and parking to fire while they were moving fast, making it so I had the advantage.
As of this moment, the hot cheat your software has failed to detect is the obvious, making it so players can clip through the floor with a flying aircraft and take out players from underneath like in this post:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Robocraft/comments/2n7mgr/where_can_i_report_hackers/
It's alleged that instant rail gun reloading still persists, too.