安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
该主题的作者已标记一个回帖作为问题的解答。
讨论规则及指引
0 
举报此帖
I have the exactly same question, I have nothing against the LGBT representation but there some games (and some really good ones, like Timespinner, wich is very good metroidvania but the representation for me is bad, like, everyone is horny in that group lol)
Also, how many hours of content?
Fun fact: Gay people are just as horny as straight people.
This thing where left-leaning media always seems compelled to portray gay people as the apostles of Jesus who have descended from Heaven to preach the virtues of tolerance and harmony is honestly just tiresome, annoying, and harmful to the cause of gay acceptance. Gay people are not saints... they're people. They can be obnoxiously horny, they can be malicious, they can do bad things... just like straight people can do all of those things. Nobody called Brock from Pokemon a bad representation of straight men. He's just a horny goofball.
TLDR; When we get to the point where gay people in media can act like Brock and nobody calls it "bad representation", but just accepts it as a cartoon character being a horny goofball, THAT is when we'll have true acceptance.
No one. It's subjective, obviously. But just because something is subjective, doesn't mean any criticism regarding that aspect is invalid just because technically no one can define exactly the boundaries of it.
Like, it's subjective to say something has bad writing. But if someone said "I haven't watched the latest Marvel movies because they have bad writing" or something like that, no one would say "Well who are you to define bad writing?", they'd be like, well, yeah, everyone says that those movies have been bad and there's a million memes about it so of course that's a reasonable view.
So in the same way, of course no one can define what is "shoe horned in", but of course anyone could think the themes of any story are badly written or forced (whether its LGBT themes or anything), and they might feel its a trend in various modern media, or media that have the LGBT tag.
Timespinner literally has a scene where the characters sit around in a campfire and go in a circle explaining what kind of LGBT they are, and by the end it turns out not a single person in your whole party is straight. Of course people think it's forced. I don't expect Beloved Rapture to have anything similar to that.
I am 18 hours in and it seems that I might be somewhat in the middle. Did explore and side quests.
Nothing LGBTQ so far. But cruel murder(ers) and despair. I like it when you have reasons to hate characters and this guy provides. : D
While this isn't entirely inaccurate, using it as a defense of people who blatantly use the "criticism" in an attempt to gatekeep media is a bit crappy. I'm not really talking about anything specific here (I haven't played this game or any of the other games mentioned in this thread), but not all criticism is equally "valid" for lack of a better word.
For instance, let's say you're in a club listening to a comedian. They tell a joke and literally everybody in the room laughs... except for you. Now, you could say that you simply didn't find the joke funny, and that's fine. But to say "The joke was poorly written" is questionable at best if it had everyone else rolling on the floor. I'm not saying "the majority opinion is the correct opinion" or anything, but at the same time if you want your media opinions to be taken seriously by others you need to be able to recognize how your own biases can cause you to see things, perhaps unreasonably, unfavorably when to a vast majority of people they're perfectly fine. Otherwise you end up looking like David Jaffe that time he tried to prove that Metroid Dread had bad level design, accidentally proved his own statements wrong on stream, and kept doubling down on it after that anyway just because he couldn't accept the idea that the problem was with him and not the game.
This is what the "the representation was forced/shoe-horned in" statement does, it makes it sound like an issue with the writing of the media itself rather than a personal preference/opinion, and if you're going to do that you should be prepared to justify it, because if you can't it very much implies something about how you see the world and minority representation in general, rather than something that the writers of the story got wrong.
Fun fact; relatively few people in real life are 100% straight. Sexual preference is a sliding scale, not a binary. If you get desperately lonely enough, you probably will go for someone you don't "prefer".