Why this is like a cheap copy of Starcraft 2?

[Clexane+]

Why copy straight when there a high quality game with same working mechanisms worked?

[BrutalGlory]

Because it's a cheap copy of SC2 and being worked on by the same devs that made SC2 - but I suspect you already knew that when you asked.

[Drogash]

well this cheap copy of Sc2 Runs Perfectly in 32.9 ultrawide 5120x1440 unlike starcraft 2 which cant be played in 32.9 ultrawide screen at all, sooo sad

[Muse Snooze]

Originally posted by Drogash:

well this cheap copy of Sc2 Runs Perfectly in 32.9 ultrawide 5120x1440 unlike starcraft 2 which cant be played in 32.9 ultrawide screen at all, sooo sad

https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/Steam-Hardware-Software-Survey-Welcome-to-Steam boo hoo, a game doesn't make use of a function less than 3% of players on average even have/use, oh my GOD how can that BE.

[Soji]

I'm all for them straight up copying SC2. I like that game and want more of it. Blizzard isn't gonna give us that anymore, no other modern RTS that has came out, AoE4, CoH3, Total Wars, that warhammer Age of Sigmar game (haven't tried zero space) even come close to the feel SC2 has. I dont think that's inherently a bad thing, especially when the thing being 'copied' isn't and wont be getting any more updates ever again. Its the only reason things like Fallout exist because it was a spiritual successor to Wasteland.

[Monk]

Agree with an author. Love SC2, had hopes for something new and unique. But what I see is just a very and very cheap copy of SC2. With a bad design. If devs made SC2 before, they are good, we already know it. So why not to make it different, take a new approach into strategy games and make something better. So many ideas to be created. Simply dont get it... When I saw a first news about a new strategy by SC team, I was so so excited, now I feel broken

[Monk]

Originally posted by Ghostvenger92:

there should of been a SC3 by now, but the team that made SC2 left Blizzard and are making this game which will be a new fresh game with the same iconic mechanics that makes the best RTS game.

Iconic mechanics you see in SC1 and SC2. They are similar, same series, but feels completely different when you play them and watch them. Each of them is unique and perfect. What you see now, is like a MOD on SC2, and thats what kills me

[BrutalGlory]

Originally posted by Ghostvenger92:

there should of been a SC3 by now, but the team that made SC2 left Blizzard and are making this game which will be a new fresh game with the same iconic mechanics that makes the best RTS game.

"new and fresh" but also "same and iconic" - those two things don't go together.

[Monk]

Originally posted by Ghostvenger92:

Originally posted by Monk:

there was also mods for SC1 and SC2 that let you play the games like diablo but then that would mean D3 was just a SC2 mod.

We are talking about two completely different games. There is a point. Mod that created a completely new and different game. Not a re-skin

Originally posted by BrutalGlory:

Originally posted by Ghostvenger92:

there should of been a SC3 by now, but the team that made SC2 left Blizzard and are making this game which will be a new fresh game with the same iconic mechanics that makes the best RTS game.

"new and fresh" but also "same and iconic" - those two things don't go together.

As I mentioned before. I think that the passage from SC1 to SC2 was one of the greatest in the game history. Similar mechanics and completely different games. Even now you cannot say that SC2 is better than SC1, because both of them are unique and good/bad only in some ways, but what is important, is that they are different and unique