Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So the game has problems (perfomance) but a unique new idea and a new gameplay.
The developer already promised, that they will work on this game for a long time to make it even better.
Give the game a few more hours to suck you in with the grand strategy part. :)
Just play Anno
This isn't some tripple A title y'know neither an MP game so the amount of players means nothing.
I have thousands of hours in EU4 CK3 HOI4 so I like both genres a lot.
It just seems like this game think big but failed at execution. The city building part isn't as good as similar games and the grand strategy part is very barebone ngl.
I didn't experience any crash in the 2 hours that I played but the weird stuttering is also annoying. Already refunded thanks for everyone's input hope to see you in another game.