Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
As for Harpoon/Red Storm Rising, having gone back and looked at the Falklands Campaign plus the Third Gulf War, I very much think Clancy (and Bond?) overestimated the effectiveness of naval anti-missile defences at the time.
However, as happened IRL, the paradigm is shifting in favour of DDGs and FFGs.
Also, even if it is a cruiser action, ships with 4+ radar-directed MAA and well-researched ECM are really hard to hit. And if you preserved some of well-armoured 1930-40s BBs, those are really hard to sink even with HSSMs.
From the previous wars (pre missile age) most aircraft kills where air to air combat, so I rather keep some CV(L)s around for air cover.