Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
Perhaps Harley got attacked on the way before delivering the cure. She was tied up in the Steel Mill so it probbably was her fault in some way.
She was stopped by Talia al Ghul, who then tries to give Batman the cure later.
Even if you assume Batman's blood contained the agent they needed to make more of the cure that is never stated anywhere. I think the plot hole isn't a hole at all, it's just all those people died. Which probably added to why Batman was kind of down in the dumps during Harley's Revenge. Even having Gorden question Robin about how Batman was doing.
The game was clearly pretty dark, especially with all the people who died during protocol 10, even if they were criminals Batman wanted to save them.
This would, again, I think, be a theory that Arkham Knight could clarify.
it's just one of those things that isn't brought up again. I can't see any way the people could have survived, Fries made it pretty clear he would need years and years of research to come up with a cure and Fries is supposed to be oe of the top scientist in the country.
I don't know what the people at Wayne Tech would have done that Fries didn't already do. It's just one of those unfortunate things that isn't talked about in detail...
Other solutions, it looks like, are:
-All the people died
-Joker was lying (like in Arkham Asylum about the bombs in Gotham, although Batman did pickup up on that (Plus, that does seem quite a weak way to fill a plot hole))
-They somehow managed to get hold of more of Ra's Al Ghul's blood (this doesn't seem likely at all)
-They somehow managed to cure them some other way (Like some of the chemical still being in Batman's blood)
-Becuase Batman
So, looking at it that way, it does appear that all of the people dying is one of the more explainable theories, but I still think it should be something wrapped up by Arkham Knight, as hundreds of innocent people dying does seem incredibly bleak, even by Arkham standards...
He said that "making the cure is easy", what he needed was a restorative enzyme to stablize it because it broke down too quickly.
Batman - "What if i told you I know a man who has been exposed to that enzyme for centuries?"
Freeze - "What man?"
Batman - "His name is Ra's Al Ghul."
Freeze - "Bring him to me. All I need is a sample of his blood. It is your only hope."
Given that same sample (from Batman's own blood this time) they (Alfred and Lucius) could have easily synthesized and mass produced the cure themselves quite easily too.
I don't think that would have worked from such a small sample. I don't think he could have taken some of Ra's blood and made his blood contain what was needed. Ra's blood only contained it because he had been getting exposed to it for centuries... So it soaked into his blood, Batman had a one time influx of Ra's blood.
I don't see why not.
[quote\I don't think he could have taken some of Ra's blood and made his blood contain what was needed. Ra's blood only contained it because he had been getting exposed to it for centuries... So it soaked into his blood, Batman had a one time influx of Ra's blood. [/quote]
Which would still be in Batman's blood ,at least in the short term, but certainly long enough that another sample could have been attained from him.
They could have theoretically gotten further samples elsewhere too, as I already suggested.
Becuase the sample that Batman took was, I believe, only the 'Blood of the Demon' chemical, whereas a full cure requires it to be bonded to human DNA, which has only occured, as far as we know, in Ra's al Ghul's blood. This same reason applies to the idea that they could use other pits: the chemical needs to be bonded to human DNA, or it won't work.
Interesting points, but is there really any reason to believe that the sample in Batman's blood, which was obtained directly from Ra's wouldn't have sufficed otherwise?
And remember, Ra's blood was left on the ground by the fence at the Arkham City entrance too. A fresh sample could have been obtained there.
As fun as this discussion is, I doubt we're ever really going to get any solid answers, not unless Paul Dini himself feels like writing one up (assuming he doesn't already have one written down or at least in mind).
to make the antodote they would have had to thin out Ra's blood, it's not like just getting his blood inside Batman's body would transform batman's blood into Ra's.
Even if they could somehow manage to get more of Ra's blood which wouldn't have been able to happen in enough time ot save the people, they couldn't have gotten enough to actually save the 2000 or more people who got infected with Joker's tainted blood..
And yeah, I hope this is something Arkham Knight at least mentions, but I wouldn't be too surprised if it just went overlooked.
But as it is, if the build up to Arkham Knight has proven anything, it's that fan theories are really cool, so discussions like this (which has turned up alot of ideas that never even occured to me) are, as you say, really fun.