Batman Return to Arkham PC!!!

[⎛⎝RabeDennis⎠⎞]

give us that!!!

[hammertime4234]

Return to Arkham is crap, even worse compared to how the originals look on the PC, we don't need it.

[ShikenNuggets]

Almost definitely not going to happen. I don't really see the point, the game still looks fantastic on PC and I think it even looks better than the remaster, so I don't see why you would buy an inferior version of a game you already own.

[Dr_N-gin]

anybody know where there is a good comparison between return to arkham remasters and the pc versions?

[FreeToaster]

Originally posted by Dr_N-gin:

anybody know where there is a good comparison between return to arkham remasters and the pc versions?

You can try Candyland on youtube, they should have some videos up by now.

[Vampirism]

they should give it to people who already owns it free

[Frannz]

Honestly, the remaster looks problematic.

First of all, textures were replaced. They didn't use higher versions of the same assets, just created new ones and some change the style of some places. Not only that, on PC some shadows have depth, in the remaster most of them are flatter.

Lighting looks better at first glance, but a lot of the shadows and light sources added are not dynamic, and look really fake when characters walk past them.

The remaster does not offer Physx and runs at 30fps.
Cutscenes also look worse on PS4.

So, honestly, I don't think we are missing much.

[robaczek]

Originally posted by SonOfMajora:

they should give it to people who already owns it free

Seeing how things are I wouldn't even want if if they paid me.... not to mention for free.

I once thought a remaster would be looking similar to Arkham Knight but when I say poor 'ol Hugo I decided to pass. -_-'

[SenMithrarin85]

Tis butt ugly. No thanks.

[De Cecco]

+
i want to have the option at least.

[Digital_Bullit]

Unless it is a hands down improvement, why would someone waste the money? The fact that its debatable automatically means it isn't worth the buy.

I can see buying it if you own a console (30 fps, slightly tuned down graphics), but the pc already had an advantage in the graphics department over the console. This release just makes the console version on par with the pc version.

[Frannz]

Originally posted by Digital_Bullit:

This release just makes the console version on par with the pc version.

Not really, makes it different.
Some textures on PC are already higher-res than what this new remaster has to offer.
They changed the textures, so they are different from the originals, while PC version has higher versions of the same original textures.

There are some better shadows here and there, but some don't work as they should, and performance is horrible on consoles.

Not only that, PC version has physx, which improve a lot the feeling of a less static world (if you have a nvidia card).

Not to mention they killed DOF pretending it was a choice to show how crisp the remaster is, but actually removes some of the original art design.

I would also say that the addition of AK rain in Asylum is just stupid and makes the impact of rain in AK go away, since you get to see the effect in the very first game. (and the effect is not very weel implemented, by the way.

[KRON]

Originally posted by Dr_N-gin:

anybody know where there is a good comparison between return to arkham remasters and the pc versions?

Here it is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUKHIvlnTgM

[AWPC]

Needs to come to PC it looks way better shader FX & HDR lighting wise!!

[ℤ𝔼ℝ𝕆ℍ𝕆𝕆𝕋]

you don't need that version trust me just get ENB.

[Vampirism]

true, i agree with that