Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://howlongtobeat.com/game/10706
Wasn't their first product that atari 50?
yeah, and call of duty is 70 because development is expensive. /s
cope more, they'd sell you rage wars without multiplayer for 50 bucks and you'd be happy with the same excuse? Just play SP trials man, game development is too hard these days!
It's half of a remaster of a 23yo game. It has half of a content of original game and it's more expensive than both quake remasters which are vastly superior and complete packages (and games). I wouldn't question the price if T3 remaster was good. It isn't good. They are justing ripping off die-hard fans. It would be way more honest if they asked for donations instead of selling T3: Campaign Edition for this price.
Game is $40 on ebay so this is cheaper
yes because a physical cartridge no longer in production that technically qualifies as an antique is totally the same as a digital copy. rofl
"another thread about price" yes there are like dozens of separate individuals making threads about this because it is objectively overpriced.