Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
no, cause most of us actually touch grass and have passionate, deep, and meaningful relationships irl. as a result, we're not thinking about that in every game we play. lol
Wrong. Everyone from a tavern wench to royalty. The practice of boning or cording the bodice of an underdress to give support to a woman's torso arose in Europe around 1500. The depth of this neckline could show the curves of the breasts, and even possibly the sternum between them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_cleavage
I'm married, but I prefer to look at eye candy when gaming. Besides you can still play male or Amish woman if that's your thing. Everyone should have a choice.
And as long as it is not enforced nudity until you can craft your own clothes, who cares.
They have a choice to be iron-clad warriors in combat situations, or iron-clad warriors.
Why not sorceresses in dresses?
I too would like to see the character creator and roster of clothing expand.