Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Overcommiting, in this case, means making an unnecessary move that doesn't leave us at an advantage. For instance, imagine one stack is a single Heart and the next stack is x/x/x/H/H/H. The initial reaction would be to play the three hearts onto the single heart on an otherwise empty stack, and close the stack. But this is overcommiting: it nets us nothing, but permanently removes a spot on the board. The right move here is to play the single heart onto the triple, thereby leaving an empty stack, an *only close the heart stack when you need the card under it.*
Whenever you're planning a move, you need to look at the cards under your move and figure out where they're going. Trace the movement as far as you can: if I close this Heart stack then I can move the 6 and then the 8, which will leave an empty column. Perfect! But, maybe you get to "I can move the 6 and then the 8, but then there's a diamond under there I can't do anything with." Don't make that move, because you'll leave yourself in a disadvantageous position: even though you've stacked 2 cards and closed the hearts, now you've replaced your empty stack with a 1-card stack and you're stuck.
Thanks! :) This is very helpful.