Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So, is it worth it? I would say yes if it were under $2.00.
It just fails to keep your attention imo.
Is it full story campgain coop?
I'm going to get some flack for saying this, but whatever - this is more or less the unofficial Rainbow Six 2. It only has "The Sum of All Fears" name so that it could piggy back on the marketing of the film, which had a substantial budget as it featured big name actors and such, and also because it was missing probably the best feature of the RS brand: planning. They simply didn't want to compromise expectations. That's okay, though, because they had other plans.
Gameplay wise, it is a solid game and is a lot of fun as long as you're not expecting it to be the be all end all squad tactical game. It's feature lite, but it still has the Tom Clancy stamp of quality. It featured a much faster pace than the original Rainbow Six, but by then, games had already started moving out of the "simulation" style of gaming that most old schoolers were accustomed to.
Some of the features concerning TSoAF is that it was basically an inbetween experiment from the old tech of RS and the new tech of RS3. You'll notice that there was never a RS2. Well... this is that game. At the time, the big thing to accomplish on the 'To-Do List" was to figure out a way to manage the team. This game featured a simplified version of team orders that would later be improved upon in RS3. Prior to this, RS featured zero team management outside of the planning stage, and Ghost Recon's well made system was quite cumbersome at best.
And... that's really the big deal with the game. It was the game that introduced team management and orders while in the game space. It was simple, but it was effective. Other than that, it's essentially Rainbow Six with better graphics, team management, and a lack of planning phase.
Enjoy!
I liked Future Soldier but, I got stuck in a mission where I need 3 more players to get through a town without being discovered and it never happened. I had some friends that helped prior to that but, one deleted me as a friend for reasons unknown, after I helped him get his stolen account back and the rest followed. I've considered the game as a loss and wasted money and uninstalled it. I, more or less, like fps shooters where I don't have to give commands to AI.
I know this comment is old, but what the hell are you talking about? Rogue Spear is Rainbow Six 2.
You also seem to talk down about Ghost Recon, even though it was a hell of a lot better than this game. If you're the biggest fanatic on the planet about Tactical Shooters, this game is a 7/10 at best. Overall, I'd say it's closer to a 6. All of its features pale in comparison to the titles it's similar to, and the AI is pretty glitchy.
For 10$ I'd say it's worth a purchase if you're into the genre, especially if you have a friend you can play it with, since it has coop.