Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I understand the issue, but still disagree with the methods used.
That said, none of this excuses the actions taken today. You don't storm people's place of work, you sign a petition and hand deliver it with thousands of signatures. You don't review bomb a game for days on end over progressively more ridiculous reasons until you finally found something tangible to latch onto. I fully respect that you guys have your own social taboos and issues over there but they don't excuse any of this. I sat here and gave you guys the benefit of the doubt and did what translating I could to understand your message boards. The fact of the matter is you guys went and ruined a woman's job over 5 to 7 year old tweets and caused the rest of us no end of delays and PM all new problems. It's BS when it's done in america, its just as BS here.
THis has nothing to do with consumer not wanting to buy the product, and all to do with an harassement campaign from a minority in South Korea.
If it really was a "no consumer wants to buy a product" they simply would have called for a boycott. But they didn't. THey went to the company. Harassed PM. Harassed the Illustrator, just to get what they want.
Sale numbers would have been fine even without those people, if they all quitted.
The term radical doesn't mean much. MLK was considered as a "radical" before being white washed.
Nelson Mandela was considered to be a radical.
Radical is just a derogatory term used to make a movement looks scarier than it really is.
That illustrator was just punished for using free speech.
I guess that means koreans (or korean women at the very least) do not have a right to free speech.
Can you atleast be genuine when you reply like this. I dislike the review bombing but they didnt "barge into the office". They literally turned up. Sat outside and one of them handed over a document of their complaints. Then PM came out and gave them chairs to sit on. Then they made a statement. Youre acting like they pushed into the office and threatened them
Unfortunately for you global standards are not equal to your personal standards. There are many others who frown on TERF ideology. And might I add, there's another name for what you're saying: Manifest Destiny. It was westerners who thought regional cultures didn't matter and started all that crap. So, joke's on you. Kindly gtfo with your self-entitled bull.
Idk if you're a westerner. Maybe you're an Asian who speaks good English. But it doesn't matter since you decided to place "global standards" (aka your personal standards) over cultural context experienced by real people who live in Korea.
Since cultures in general have differing values and view things differently, I can kind of understand how things can escalate. But at face value, if we were to just go based on the misandry, and cancel-culture, Korea doesn't really seem that different from the West on these subjects.
I can't say that I am very well-versed in Korean culture though.
Also, it is probably worth noting that the illustrator isn't a TERF. Probably best to not throw around and misuse misogynistic slurs like that.
This is a link to the illustrator's past social media activities.
https://gall.dcinside.com/mgallery/board/view/?id=lobotomycorporation&no=1462193
From the link, you can see that the illustrator revealed his radical feminist thoughts on social media.
Also, as can be seen in the PM's notice, it is clearly correct not to associate ideas that can be socially controversial with the company.
If she wanted to assert her ideas, she should have at least used an account that had no connection to her work account.
Nothing you saw? What exactly did you see?
So you're basing your personal crusade on the limited number of screenshots and tweets posted by other people?
Did you even bother to go into BOTH sides of the community (As in TERF and Toxic Males) and try to piece together an argument of your own? No, right? You probably just picked up bits and pieces thrown to you by other English-speakers who have only scratched the surface of this unfortunate drama, and glossed it over with your personal ideology, which, from the things you've posted, seems to be leaning left.
This has literally nothing to do with TERFs, not a single thing mentioned by either side has anything to do with trans people in the slightest, stop throwing the word around like you know what it means.