Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
you can kind of tell with how all of the abnos have a fairy-tale bend instead of PM's usual mix of abno types, since mimi designed them all.
about the controversial part i remember hearing that she was contracted because the director liked her work, i also find weird how many people try to defend her blindly when she is kind of a known sperg who admitted to have already been blacklisted from two other companies
as for blindly defending, don't think anybody is defending mimi "blindly" in this. my personal standpoint is that WL was OK, a little ham-fisted but a decent side-read; mimi made the comic herself and therefore has the rights to take down the comic, so everybody complaining that she didn't is just being entitled; and her preemptive aggression at taking WL down everywhere probably wasn't the best move, but it's hardly criminal and doesn't warrant the harassment she's getting. remember that before this, she decided to leave WL up with PM after the last 2 drama incidents that happened, yet it's only now that people are now acting like she's a nutcase for finally acting and de-associating her work with PM after how they handled the controversy. so it really seems like people are just attacking her with association politics and character smearing, bc she dared to defy PM.
i don't condone harrasment my main gripe with this is that while i agree she has the rights to copyright and made the story i understand she was paid for it do correct me if im wrong if it was purely a collaboration so it seems unjust for one party to decide what is done with the work especially if it was the one being the contrated
i dont know many image hosting provider so im going to use catbox
https://files.catbox.moe/x5iobi.png
unless im misinterpreting wath she wrote wich could happen she petty much said she has been blacklisted twice before
also, you don't condone harassment, but you've got no issues with slander and calling her a sperg? i know there's a difference between the two, but all you're doing is pushing the "she's nuts and deserves all the hate she's getting" by doing this public name-calling on someone who can't read or reply to the things you're saying about her.
do you also think that ppl who publicly talked sht about watson behind his back are totally fine bc they weren't the ones who personally stalked and doxed him? just curious.
well, if you're just giving us the SS without the context, it's near-impossible to tell what that tweet is talking about. running it through google translate, i got this:
"I received a certificate of content for intimidation on the first debut platform (really the first time), on the second platform, there was a blacklist within the company, and on the third platform, the total revenue was settled at 160,000 won after the first month of mg for two years, etc. It was processed and passed on. I hope that the noise will disappear for those who read the work this time as well."
it sounds like a lawsuit against a single company if you ask me, but i'm not a native KR reader and i have no idea what the context of this tweet thread is.