Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
For real though if that heartless MTX ridden garbage Diablo 4 sold so many copies at $70 launch price you know every company is thinking...Why aren't we doing that?
Of course new games come with a premium to pay but with that perspective makes you think is it really worth that much of a premium (MTX and other BS aside)?
$70 is the standard for console games, but for PC games the average price for a AAA title is still $60. The main reason why people avoid console games is to prevent the exploitative pricing and restrictive hardware caused by 3 major companies monopolizing the market. comparably, PC gaming has more competitive pricing. Vanilla MK1 is no anywhere near worth $70, especially since we know that there will be extensive amounts of DLC.
With that being said, it doesn't really matter since most savvy people will just wait a couple of months and then buy it for less on sites like G 2 A.com.
Yeah I know. In my head when I wrote that was, I might be able to justify the price if it was developed in house but I'm not willing to gamble that with whoever they hire to do the port.
MKX was a complete disaster. Wasn't that also the same year when Arkham Knight and MKX were temporarily de-listed from Steam for nearly a year?
____________________________________________________________
MK11 worked fine for people but I never was able to get it running well, I'd get a lot of hitching just enough to disrupt the flow of the game anytime it would switch to a cinematic (Krushing Blows, Fatal Blows, Fatalities, etc.,).
As for the $70 is the new standard, that's all dependent upon the consumers. Just like micro-transactions, it only exist because we (the consumers) fork over billions every year on leased digital knickknacks. Now I'm completely aware of the rising cost of games and of course inflation (even though it's completely transitional
I have no doubt this game will sell very well and thus emboldening companies even more. As previously mentioned Diablo 4 did it and sold extremely well - I would've bought Diablo 4 but I don't have a phone
They keep pushing boundaries and trying new things.
Like you should try a job and savings.
What boundaries are they pushing and what new things?
Then you go for the ad hominem? That's funny.
I see a half-baked assist system designed to sell Kameos. I'd be willing to bet they will be selling skins for those Kameos as well (for the double dip), how many Kombat Bucks will those go for I wonder?
There is the cost of production and then there is the exploiting of players. You're right I don't have to buy the game and should save money, that's a great call. Now excuse me I gotta go strap on my job helmet and squeeze down into a job cannon and fire off into Jobland where jobs grow on jobbies.
Have a good one.
Ig youre right. Maybe $60 is still the standard for PC because the companies outsource the PC port to some place where labor is cheap. If ports were made in the US the $70 standard would be more justified though, although some recent games have released at $70 on PC
this NRS employee wants a jester