SF6 is mid and Mk1 is better then it

[kemonirules]

SF6 is repetitive, has a boring story, has a mid ost, and is for the weak

[potato]

then it what? finish the sentence

[kiteless 凧無し]

MK1 also has less current players than SF6 despite being brand new, what does that say?

[Cpt Obvious]

MK has cooler characters than SF at this point.

[vault2049]

Both are mid, but MK1 has severe performance issues. SF6 does not have and didn't have any at launch.

[Sardorim]

SF6 is more for casuals, which is okay. It has a low curve to start up, and a high ceiling to master.

MK1 is more casual friendly, but it's missing a lot of casual oriented stuff that SF6 has which makes SF6 so appealing.

[Sardorim]

Originally posted by vault2049:

Both are mid, but MK1 has severe performance issues. SF6 does not have and didn't have any at launch.

MK1 has 0 issues for me.

The only issues in many cases I see are hardware and driver updates. Or those that are using displays that are way too powerful for their PC specs to handle in regards to MK1.

[Nix]

"that's better/worse therefore this is better/worse".
A small mind doesn't contemplate the concept of "different", just like a machine that needs to be constantly directed, needs the functions ">" or "<" next to a value in order to accomplish the most basic operations, being totally unable to assign or see a reliable value for itself.

[bulldog0890]

lol no, sf6 is far better. mk has always been real jank and slow. also the damage in mk1 is all out of whack. so many fights move at a snails pace from each player cause one screw up means losing 50% hp in one combo

[ViciousDreamz]

Yet street fighter 6 has more players lol. This game barely hit 20k for a new game

[Tonio]

i prefer mk1 , but at least capcom made the pc version playable. NRS has give us a 3rd party port with performance issues

[Capn Gibbens]

I'm shocked how so far, SF6 had a bigger launch than MK1 on PC. But I enjoyed the story a little more here on !.

[CryonicSuspension]

Originally posted by bulldog0890:

lol no, sf6 is far better. mk has always been real jank and slow. also the damage in mk1 is all out of whack. so many fights move at a snails pace from each player cause one screw up means losing 50% hp in one combo

Original MK 1 & 2 in the arcade ( MK 2 on the SNES ) was the peak.

[HekaDooM]

Mk died after 3. This is a poorly animated abomination. Cope

[Rizo the Hunter]

Originally posted by kemonirules:

SF6 is repetitive, has a boring story, has a mid ost, and is for the weak

I have to disagree with you on that one. SF6 feels polished and snappy af.

[Can...you...help]

SF6 is better in almost (if not completly) all departement. MK1 has a cool story but that's where it end unfortunatly. Online suck, invasion is more of a boring grindfest than ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ World Tour rpg. i mean i like mk, but sf6 take teh cake 4 time before mk1 can even hope to be it's competitor.

And casual got the eye for sf6, so i'm not even sure they'll buy mk1 unless it's on a good sale