IMO, this should be marked as BETA. It has a lot of bugs. It's not beginner friendly, either. If you know nothing of programming, you would probably find it hard to follow and learn. It doesn't really have an audience: It's too buggy for professional development, yet too complicated for beginners, IMO.

"Programming Without Coding" sounds like a misnomer, too. It's not like SCRATCH, for instance. You can't just build the code like building blocks, per se. You need to understand the semantics of RING to program with it. For instance, you need to know the syntax of conditionals, strings, etc.

It says I used it for 12.5 hours, but that's a lie, lol. I left the program open overnight :) I used it for maybe a couple of hours, exploring what it was about, but I keep running into bugs.

For example, it will crash out of no where, then you lose all your unsaved code. If I run into it again, I will describe what happened.

There are other areas that don't make sense, like you can't move blocks of code through drag and drop or between branches. Let's say you want to enclose an area into a loop that you already created... Well, you have to copy, cut, paste it into the new area. You can't just relocate it.

Another annoying area is how the console popup works: When you run code for console mode, a CMD prompt pops up, which is fine, but you can't reuse that popup and put it into a split screen. The popup takes forever to come up on my computer, then each debugging requires a new popup, which isn't on top of the screen, so you have to navigate to it through the task bar.

If you try to use the program in split screen, the program crashes for some strange reason. Like if I put the CMD prompt on one side and this on the other, it will crash and freeze.

There is no way to put the CMD prompt into the development area, either, so it's aggravating. When I was looking online, I came across RING Notepad, which does have input in the development, too.

Some of the decisions seem weird, like the Switch statement: It has cases for the individual cases, yet in the RING Notepad, a lot of examples uses ON, so that's a weird change. I noticed that you could use multiple things for the same thing, like PRINT versus SEE versus PUT. I don't know the language enough, but the documentation uses SEE a lot, so it's weird that this uses PRINT everywhere. It's just confusing if you are following the RING documentation.

I could see the developer is passionate, and I support that, but I can't recommend it outside BETA. Thus, I will go with not recommended for that reason. If it was in BETA, I would recommend it.

PWCT is a refreshing entry into the field of easier to use products for conceptualizing an idea into an actual working application. PWCT should be considered an easier transition into the world of understanding what it is to develop an application. With its visual approach to programming it makes the understanding of what is required and how to apply it less of a burden on people who want to create applications.
How does it do this? It provides a list of many of the building pieces called components in PWCT that allow you to apply everything from declaring variables to interfacing with files or databases. Does this require you to understand the concepts of developing applications? Yes, it does but the learning curve to gain this knowledge is made easier by PWCT’s visual approach to putting the application together.
It closely resembles the idea put forth by Legos the popular toys that provide a way to build anything you can imagine. Although Legos will allow you to build complex building structures it does require you to understand building principles to accomplish that goal. However, like Legos there is little, or no knowledge required to get started and begin to build something that works and bring you satisfaction that it is indeed possible to take an idea from concept to reality with the right tools.
PWCT is supported by a team of dedicated professionals who are very responsive to the questions and needs of their community. Each day a new tutorial is being created to help new users of this product to create something that works while learning programming concepts at the same time. The community is strong as well for a new product with some of its members providing tutorials based on the learning they are doing of PWCT to assist others who might be helped by a different perspective; that of someone learning the product as they are.
The price point to dive into this development environment is very inexpensive currently compared to other integrated development environments or tools. What can you develop with it, really anything you can imagine. A personal application, something that would be sold commercially, or even a game as it supports many gaming libraries as well. As you progress your knowledge of the development process will improve. That learning process is required to have an understanding of the pieces needed to create a larger more complex application.
Achieving this though is made easier by PWCT’s approach to it. I as an owner of the tool and end-user still learning, encourage others to jump into this environment. What do you have to lose, a few dollars and a little time if it doesn’t work for you. What do you have to gain, a broader world where you now can create applications that serve your needs and allow you to gain some important skills in the world of development.

Amazing piece of software especially for the price.
I've come across a couple of bugs since purchasing, of which the Dev has fixed the issue within a hour.
This is the first time I've seen a Dev that's so focused on the software and the customers.
I will add more to this review within the next couple of weeks after I've finished the projects I'm doing in PROGRAMMING WITHOUT CODING, to give you more information.

Learn basic language but with style and pattern

As someone who knows next to nothing about coding. I'm going into this with a huge belly flop. I'm personally having no luck with it, but I'm still learning, I've noticed a few minor problems with the layout. To me It looks like it has a lot of potential to be something amazing. I just don't think I'm ready yet. I'm giving it a thumbs up for now, cause it seems the creator wants this to work.
For now I'm going to sit on it, and let some time grow with it, and then I'll start watching some youtube videos on it to learn more. I believe people will start making some to show it has the potential to be awesome.

With a few feature improvements it could be a good clickteam fusion replacement.

I like the concept, but I will not really use it. (And neither refund)
It's lacking one simple thing, autocomplete for imported libraries. It could scan the library folder and allow you to pick the library to include.
Another thing it could do is provide autocomplete for the included library methods.

Those are things that classical IDEs do.

I do think it's good for beginners as it ease a bit the learning process by offering less friction for the base components.

Maybe the developer can look at MPS, which would allow to do crazy stuff!

Its has many uses. As it grows with time it will become more powerful. Glad I purchased it.

[DRM-Free]
Can be launched directly from *.exe file.

I love it good job keep it up and keep updating God bless y'all ❤️💯