Maybe better performance on BATTLE.NET ?

[zaafaraj]

any one tried to switch on Battle.Net maybe better FPS or no lags ?
cause im waiting like 5 days when i can play normally ...

[anotherland]

no.

[breadman]

no, i have the game on both, it's same

[Hyperflux]

Same issues on both platforms since the update. It's not even an FPS issue anymore, it's just stuttering and buggy as hell. Billion dollar company - dog game. Can't even get into a ranked game without having someone DC.

[1MantisPhoenix]

multiplayer > warzone

[Pitty]

Originally posted by zaafaraj:

any one tried to switch on Battle.Net maybe better FPS or no lags ?
cause im waiting like 5 days when i can play normally ...

There is no difference with lags since the servers are the same ingame. And the FPS drops are more an you problem.

By all means i dont defend the game at all its not a good game but i didnt encounter that massive fps drops like so many stated. I guess they doexaggerate with their dropped frames.

[Lizzy]

Originally posted by Pitty:

Originally posted by zaafaraj:

any one tried to switch on Battle.Net maybe better FPS or no lags ?
cause im waiting like 5 days when i can play normally ...

There is no difference with lags since the servers are the same ingame. And the FPS drops are more an you problem.

By all means i dont defend the game at all its not a good game but i didnt encounter that massive fps drops like so many stated. I guess they doexaggerate with their dropped frames.

You probably just play standard multiplayer then. Because Warzone / DMZ maps especially Vondel has these issues where the game after the update either doesn't use the GPU (mostly 30-40% only) or it absolutely hammers the CPU suddenly.

I myself have no issues in standard Multiplayer but the moment i switch and want to play a warzone match i immediately have low fps and stuttering and low GPU usage while the games metric ingame says it uses "60-70%" gpu but it doesn't.

Just because it doesn't exist in the modes you play doesn't mean that it's not a thing.

[Pitty]

Originally posted by Lizzy:

Originally posted by Pitty:

There is no difference with lags since the servers are the same ingame. And the FPS drops are more an you problem.

By all means i dont defend the game at all its not a good game but i didnt encounter that massive fps drops like so many stated. I guess they doexaggerate with their dropped frames.

You probably just play standard multiplayer then. Because Warzone / DMZ maps especially Vondel has these issues where the game after the update either doesn't use the GPU (mostly 30-40% only) or it absolutely hammers the CPU suddenly.

I myself have no issues in standard Multiplayer but the moment i switch and want to play a warzone match i immediately have low fps and stuttering and low GPU usage while the games metric ingame says it uses "60-70%" gpu but it doesn't.

Just because it doesn't exist in the modes you play doesn't mean that it's not a thing.

infact the opposite is the case. I play more DMZ then MP but the lowest frames i got was around 130 (locked to 144 due to the monitor) on vondel. so i dont realy know if its just some people that dont have that issues or not

[Lizzy]

Originally posted by Pitty:

Originally posted by Lizzy:

You probably just play standard multiplayer then. Because Warzone / DMZ maps especially Vondel has these issues where the game after the update either doesn't use the GPU (mostly 30-40% only) or it absolutely hammers the CPU suddenly.

I myself have no issues in standard Multiplayer but the moment i switch and want to play a warzone match i immediately have low fps and stuttering and low GPU usage while the games metric ingame says it uses "60-70%" gpu but it doesn't.

Just because it doesn't exist in the modes you play doesn't mean that it's not a thing.

infact the opposite is the case. I play more DMZ then MP but the lowest frames i got was around 130 (locked to 144 due to the monitor) on vondel. so i dont realy know if its just some people that dont have that issues or not

You see mp is standard for me around 120 fps Vondel was always around 100-120 like many actually report but now it's suddenly 50. And they are still working on a global fix for these issues https://trello.com/c/mJavpmn3

[Pitty]

Originally posted by Lizzy:

Originally posted by Pitty:

infact the opposite is the case. I play more DMZ then MP but the lowest frames i got was around 130 (locked to 144 due to the monitor) on vondel. so i dont realy know if its just some people that dont have that issues or not

You see mp is standard for me around 120 fps Vondel was always around 100-120 like many actually report but now it's suddenly 50. And they are still working on a global fix for these issues https://trello.com/c/mJavpmn3

Like i said it seems that not everybody has this problem. The avg. for mr is about 130-135 but wont drop lower (besides shader optimization) on MP, DMZ and WZ.

But as we know Acti is fixing minor things like that exp glitch spots first then fixing major issues ^^