Why is battlefield and call of duty different?

[zentor1405]

Me: Battlefields gameplay is built around communtiy or large scale team based gameplay where as call of duty gameplay is around squad based gaemplay,

Bud: No both are same, call of duty has modes that provide large scale team gameplay. they are same.

Me: ok, lets assume a call of duty game and a battlefield game comming out. would your first impressions both games be they are communtiy / large team focused game or would u expect one of the to be the latter?

Bud: i would expect both of them to be a communtiy or large sale team based game due to modes


let us know fundamentally which one of us right??
or just drop a Dis / call us dorks in the comment¯\(ツ)/¯

[potato]

i dunno but bf just feels wrong to me

i prefer cod

[BIGDOJO]

bf you might have slightly more walking distance to cover before someone runs behind you and murders you, then dramatically adds time through the option of waiting for a medic, plus respawn timer, etc.

in cod the game saves you that time and just spawns the person directly behind you, and then you can just mash F and immediately respawn behind them to get your revenge. much more elegant in my opinion.

[zentor1405]

The question here is not which is better >> it is more which of the 2 games is more large scale team / community focused and centric game? which one of these games outcome depend more on the team / community than a single persons complete effort / skill?