I rlly want to play the old maps in mw3

[Kouki]

its so annoying that it cost 70$ like a full game package..
its the same game as mw2 but you got remastered old maps
the price is ridiculous it should cost around 40$.

[potato]

it's not the same game and not even mw2 2009 was $40, it was $60

[Kouki]

Originally posted by potato:

it's not the same game and not even mw2 2009 was $40, it was $60

bro its the same game..same graphics
so they added slide canceling wow..it shouldnt be 70$

[Kouki]

Originally posted by COZZACK:

It's a low effort cash grab before they give control to Microsoft

y idk if to wait for sale
like i rlly want to play the old maps in mw3,mw2 maps kinda sucks
but 70euro man..full price dlc
i only care for the old maps

[Uhzu]

I dropped cod after 2019. When I saw/played MW2 I knew these games were going to ♥♥♥♥. They’re too money hungry to make good games anymore. It’s all low effort bundle skins and half baked game modes. Microsoft ain’t saving this.

[LetM3WorK]

Originally posted by Hazor:

I dropped cod after 2019. When I saw/played MW2 I knew these games were going to ♥♥♥♥. They’re too money hungry to make good games anymore. It’s all low effort bundle skins and half baked game modes. Microsoft ain’t saving this.

You dropped at the dumbest time possible. lol COD ran on the same engine from 2007-2019. When people were asking for CHANGE, they didn't mean jetpacks and space suits, they meant a new engine to update movement and gunplay.

Now they finally delivered a new engine and since then it's been improving. Sure, some changes were beyond stupid like the red dots, but when it comes to raw gameplay it's leaps and bounds better than what we got since Ghosts. You had MULTIPLE years that were waaaaaay worse to quit, yet you didn't. So I can't take you serious.

As someone who is coming back from BO3 (another dog crap cod title), the beta has provided all I need to know. I can finally play SnD again and I'm down for it. Everybody here crying about DLC is braindead. You have been paying for DLC's for over 5 years now, that's what yearly cycles do.

[Mittens]

Originally posted by potato:

it's not the same game and not even mw2 2009 was $40, it was $60

It's literally the same game
He never said MW2 was 40$
and he's 100% right, so no clown award for you.

[Mittens]

Originally posted by LetM3WorK:

Originally posted by Hazor:

I dropped cod after 2019. When I saw/played MW2 I knew these games were going to ♥♥♥♥. They’re too money hungry to make good games anymore. It’s all low effort bundle skins and half baked game modes. Microsoft ain’t saving this.

You dropped at the dumbest time possible. lol COD ran on the same engine from 2007-2019. When people were asking for CHANGE, they didn't mean jetpacks and space suits, they meant a new engine to update movement and gunplay.

Now they finally delivered a new engine and since then it's been improving. Sure, some changes were beyond stupid like the red dots, but when it comes to raw gameplay it's leaps and bounds better than what we got since Ghosts. You had MULTIPLE years that were waaaaaay worse to quit, yet you didn't. So I can't take you serious.

As someone who is coming back from BO3 (another dog crap cod title), the beta has provided all I need to know. I can finally play SnD again and I'm down for it. Everybody here crying about DLC is braindead. You have been paying for DLC's for over 5 years now, that's what yearly cycles do.

....He dropped it when MW 2019 released.... so when the new engine released, and correctly guessed the series was going to repeat itself and dipped...
♥♥♥♥ this is the first COD to actually get a negative rating from IGN and they normally suck Activisions ♥♥♥♥. They are abusing Treyarch employees like hell, all because of siphoning more money due to the acquisition

The fact that you could not realize that OR straight up forgot when the new engine was actually used is pretty funny and fits with the average 6 IQ Cod kids

[Kouki]

Originally posted by Mittens:

Originally posted by potato:

it's not the same game and not even mw2 2009 was $40, it was $60

It's literally the same game
He never said MW2 was 40$
and he's 100% right, so no clown award for you.

I only care for the old maps for the nostalgia
but man 70euro is alot
even my body tells me its alot to pay.

[potato]

Originally posted by Mittens:

It's literally the same game

how is it the same game if it has a different campaign and different maps

[Kouki]

Originally posted by potato:

Originally posted by Mittens:

It's literally the same game

how is it the same game if it has a different campaign and different maps

Graphics/engine is still the same
so they added slide cancelling (movement is faster- they could have done that with a patch in mw2) it doesnt mean that the price should be 70euro,maybe 40euro for the remake maps and zombies.
nobody buys cod for the campaign btw and the campaign is bad according to the reviews.

[potato]

Originally posted by Kouki:

Graphics/engine is still the same

newsflash, they've been using the same engine for decades

Originally posted by Kouki:

nobody buys cod for the campaign btw and the campaign is bad according to the reviews.

campaign being bad has no bearing on that, you're claiming it's the same game, by your logic cod vanguard is the same game cause it also has a bad campaign

[Mittens]

Originally posted by potato:

Originally posted by Mittens:

It's literally the same game

how is it the same game if it has a different campaign and different maps

Because its using the exact same assets, a barely written script and a 3 hour campaign, the same exact multiplayer using the exact same maps, and warzone with no differences, and a shoe horned zombies from Cold War.

Apart from the 3 hour campaign it's no different and should've been 20$

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ hell in task manager for 2 days it CALLED IT MW2!!

[potato]

Originally posted by Mittens:

Because its using the exact same assets, a barely written script and a 3 hour campaign, the same exact multiplayer and warzone with no differences, and a shoe horned zombies from Cold War.

another newsflash: they've been reusing assets for decades

[Mittens]

Originally posted by potato:

Originally posted by Kouki:

Graphics/engine is still the same

newsflash, they've been using the same engine for decades

Originally posted by Kouki:

nobody buys cod for the campaign btw and the campaign is bad according to the reviews.

campaign being bad has no bearing on that, you're claiming it's the same game, by your logic cod vanguard is the same game cause it also has a bad campaign

https://www.ign.com/articles/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-3-campaign-disc-required-error-asks-for-mw2-ps4-disc-update

[Mittens]

Originally posted by potato:

Originally posted by Mittens:

Because its using the exact same assets, a barely written script and a 3 hour campaign, the same exact multiplayer and warzone with no differences, and a shoe horned zombies from Cold War.

another newsflash: they've been reusing assets for decades

So then you agree that it's the same game got it lmao