Crazy that sledgehammer known for making bad cod games made a bad cod game

[R for Reload]

just like the campaign just like the multiplayer both are garbage.
yet you still bought it lol.

[pete]

WWII was ok, tho

[R for Reload]

Originally posted by slappy_spatchy:

WWII was ok, tho

No it wasnt you just saw some garbage streamer talking about it lately and now think its okay.

[EdgarAllenPog]

aye if you broke just say so its all g

[LetM3WorK]

Originally posted by R for Reload:

Originally posted by slappy_spatchy:

WWII was ok, tho

No it wasnt you just saw some garbage streamer talking about it lately and now think its okay.

Treyarch only has 1 good game. BO1. All of the others are absolute dog crap.

Infinity Ward hasn't been the same since MW2. They basically just piggy back onto the other two and are allowed to do so, simply for brand recognition reasons.

Sledge Hammer is responsible for the OG MW3 which is still the best COD imo.

Not that any of that matters. lol They all work together, otherwise they couldn't push it out yearly. The only thing they change is the "playstyle" according to the studio name. So Black Ops stuff will have those usual characters and playstyle etc. But in reality all studios are working on each and every single game together.
This also gives another layer of security, since the mindless peasants will fight over which studio is their favorite and stay loyal. Kind of like sport fanatics.

So yeah.

There is not a single COD campaign I can think of that is truly "awesome". The only one would be MW the original, since it was the first transition. Once you've seen that campaign, you literally have seen them all. As far as the multiplayer goes, the beta was the best experience I've had in a very long time. BO3 was the last COD I bought, but not the last beta I played and in general when at a buddies house I could do a few matches here and there. MW3 the beta was insanely good if you actually like to play objective game modes like SnD and Dom. You TDM weirdos can wait until next year, thanks.

[R for Reload]

Originally posted by LetM3WorK:

Originally posted by R for Reload:

No it wasnt you just saw some garbage streamer talking about it lately and now think its okay.

Treyarch only has 1 good game. BO1. All of the others are absolute dog crap.

Infinity Ward hasn't been the same since MW2. They basically just piggy back onto the other two and are allowed to do so, simply for brand recognition reasons.

Sledge Hammer is responsible for the OG MW3 which is still the best COD imo.

Not that any of that matters. lol They all work together, otherwise they couldn't push it out yearly. The only thing they change is the "playstyle" according to the studio name. So Black Ops stuff will have those usual characters and playstyle etc. But in reality all studios are working on each and every single game together.
This also gives another layer of security, since the mindless peasants will fight over which studio is their favorite and stay loyal. Kind of like sport fanatics.

So yeah.

There is not a single COD campaign I can think of that is truly "awesome". The only one would be MW the original, since it was the first transition. Once you've seen that campaign, you literally have seen them all. As far as the multiplayer goes, the beta was the best experience I've had in a very long time. BO3 was the last COD I bought, but not the last beta I played and in general when at a buddies house I could do a few matches here and there. MW3 the beta was insanely good if you actually like to play objective game modes like SnD and Dom. You TDM weirdos can wait until next year, thanks.

I dont like treyarch games
MW3 had awful meta with guns
effectively two guns of each type were the exact same
While that didnt happen in MW2.
Sledgehammer wasn't responsible they worked heavily with infinity ward
Warzone 1 was the best game by far.

[LetM3WorK]

You might want to watch the developers video for the OG MW3 again. lol

I could use any gun in MW3 and dominate. Literally, any gun. You didn't even play MW3 during it's prime kiddo.

The fact you think Warzone is the best tells me all I need to know. You have no clue what you are talking about. I'm happy I won't have to play with you when it drops in a couple of days.

[R for Reload]

Originally posted by LetM3WorK:

You might want to watch the developers video for the OG MW3 again. lol

I could use any gun in MW3 and dominate. Literally, any gun. You didn't even play MW3 during it's prime kiddo.

The fact you think Warzone is the best tells me all I need to know. You have no clue what you are talking about. I'm happy I won't have to play with you when it drops in a couple of days.

yes keep up the 1.1K/D champ.

[nemosquish]

One fine day, we will all be so full of nuts, we will not refund the purchase of a call of duty video game.

[Gallus Gallus]

OG MW3 was a huge led down too imo.

At the time MW3’s graphic was really outdated, mid to boring gameplay and music, not much of improvement mechanic and storytelling wise, just milking the success of MW2.

Luckily I’ve learned my lesson, when I heard this year’s MW3 is beings made by Sledgehammer games, I didn’t preorder it, even though MW is my most interested storyline of CoD.

[R for Reload]

Originally posted by TakoSuke:

OG MW3 was a huge led down too imo.

At the time MW3’s graphic was really outdated, mid to boring gameplay and music, not much of improvement mechanic and storytelling wise, just milking the success of MW2.

Luckily I’ve learned my lesson, when I heard this year’s MW3 is beings made by Sledgehammer games, I didn’t preorder it, even though MW is my most interested storyline of CoD.

No improvement for mechanic or story telling.
MW2 had really good story telling.

[nemosquish]

Today, we will buy Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3, 2023 for 69.99+tax

[Jarells]

Originally posted by slappy_spatchy:

WWII was ok, tho

sorry man, but Cod WWII was actually awful.