Worst campaign in COD history

[☆野山猹_Official☆]

Open Combat Mission is the worst system they have in the this second DLC of MW1, one or two missions may be great to bring new features to this series' campaign but when 2/3 of the whole campaign is about it, it begins to stink, and if you don't find boxes which are placed everywhere, you can finish any of those mission under 10 minutes, watching cutscenes is much interesting than that. Besides that,the plot sucks,the ending is messing with players and kick you right in the balls, and the best level is Passenger.
3 hours of gameplay, reusing maps from previous games, overall, this one can easily be the worst campaign COD ever had, and literally the worst one since the first game that released in 2003, and if you think the campaign is good, i think you are crazy and should be locked in mental hospital

[Mr. Warhead]

I did enjoy the mechanics of the campaigns. I just wished it was a big grander like MW3 was back in the day.

[alien_tickler]

it's a DLC, what did you expect

[Justin ✅]

Originally posted by alien_tickler:

it's a DLC, what did you expect

most expensive dlc in the history of mankind

[LetM3WorK]

Originally posted by Justin ✅:

Originally posted by alien_tickler:

it's a DLC, what did you expect

most expensive dlc in the history of mankind

You weirdos crack me up. lol Any game with a yearly cycle is DLC. You can't make a brandnew game in 1 year. That's why COD ran on the same engine from 2007-2019.

Also, who the hell cares about the campaign? LOL I'm rather happy they didn't waste a huge chunk of the budget on bs CGI explosions and celeb cameos like Kevin Spacey. Ever since MW1 the OG COD was never about single-player story.

As someone who is coming back from BO3, I have to say that this campaign is a million times better than BO3. People act like it's this horrible piece of dog crap, when in reality COD story modes have never been good. lol The only reason MW the original had success with it, was because everything was new. 3D multiplayer arcade shooter in a real modern shooting setting, not world war or futuristic. After that it got mundane real quick, because people rather play MP or Zombies.

[Camargo]

I agree.

F.

[BEEP!]

I straight up watch a stream and the guy was in cutscenes longer than his actual gameplay of the game like WTF like he could have skipped the cutscenes and maybe had a little over an hr of actual gameplay lol

[Cheez3™]

u tripping, I already finished the campaing and had fun with it.
as DMZ enjoyer, it was hella cool.

[☆野山猹_Official☆]

Originally posted by LetM3WorK:

Originally posted by Justin ✅:

most expensive dlc in the history of mankind

You weirdos crack me up. lol Any game with a yearly cycle is DLC. You can't make a brandnew game in 1 year. That's why COD ran on the same engine from 2007-2019.

Also, who the hell cares about the campaign? LOL I'm rather happy they didn't waste a huge chunk of the budget on bs CGI explosions and celeb cameos like Kevin Spacey. Ever since MW1 the OG COD was never about single-player story.

As someone who is coming back from BO3, I have to say that this campaign is a million times better than BO3. People act like it's this horrible piece of dog crap, when in reality COD story modes have never been good. lol The only reason MW the original had success with it, was because everything was new. 3D multiplayer arcade shooter in a real modern shooting setting, not world war or futuristic. After that it got mundane real quick, because people rather play MP or Zombies.

Why are you defending them? That's not the reason why they charge us so much money and let us play the same stuff again.
Also, there'are still some people that only care about campaign, some of my friends are suck at MP so they go for the PVE content.Don't forget the original MW, campaigns of old trilogy has great characters, there are also some impressive moments and unforgettable endings in those games, they can do it 10 years ago why they can't make it even better in better graphics and gunplay？

[Bobr]

Originally posted by LetM3WorK:

Originally posted by Justin ✅:

most expensive dlc in the history of mankind

You weirdos crack me up. lol Any game with a yearly cycle is DLC. You can't make a brandnew game in 1 year. That's why COD ran on the same engine from 2007-2019.

Also, who the hell cares about the campaign? LOL I'm rather happy they didn't waste a huge chunk of the budget on bs CGI explosions and celeb cameos like Kevin Spacey. Ever since MW1 the OG COD was never about single-player story.

As someone who is coming back from BO3, I have to say that this campaign is a million times better than BO3. People act like it's this horrible piece of dog crap, when in reality COD story modes have never been good. lol The only reason MW the original had success with it, was because everything was new. 3D multiplayer arcade shooter in a real modern shooting setting, not world war or futuristic. After that it got mundane real quick, because people rather play MP or Zombies.

Until they decided to combine all the studios into one group to make games together, cod used to have 3 years of development, not 1.

The fact that they wasted any budget on this campaign at all is a tragedy. No one is asking for Shakespeare levels of writing. Or reinventing the fps genre like halo 1. Titanfall 2 is proof that quality is better than quantity. I would rather play a super short, 3 hour campaign of good set pieces, than 6 hours of "open combat".

[Milkdromeda]

Originally posted by LetM3WorK:

Originally posted by Justin ✅:

most expensive dlc in the history of mankind

You weirdos crack me up. lol Any game with a yearly cycle is DLC. You can't make a brandnew game in 1 year. That's why COD ran on the same engine from 2007-2019.

Also, who the hell cares about the campaign? LOL I'm rather happy they didn't waste a huge chunk of the budget on bs CGI explosions and celeb cameos like Kevin Spacey. Ever since MW1 the OG COD was never about single-player story.

As someone who is coming back from BO3, I have to say that this campaign is a million times better than BO3. People act like it's this horrible piece of dog crap, when in reality COD story modes have never been good. lol The only reason MW the original had success with it, was because everything was new. 3D multiplayer arcade shooter in a real modern shooting setting, not world war or futuristic. After that it got mundane real quick, because people rather play MP or Zombies.

Oops than why where BO4 sales where soo bad?
COD should be and must be always linear the way it intended to be.
Your opinion must be respectet but majority always wins and MW3 is a cheap low effort developed game for 99 euros are you kidding me?

[kennii | GER]

Spend your money every year for this and you will get more nice campaigns.

[Aprendiz Sol]

Filhos da p**a mataram o Soap