Modern Warfare III was never meant to be a dlc

[ZONE]

It was always meant to be a direct sequel to Modern Warfare II. The whole 70$ dlc was just a rumor, a false rumor that a bunch of people followed the narrative for (myself included but i understood better). To me, i thought the campaign was actually really good! It wasn't perfect but i vastly prefer it to Modern Warfare II's campaign. With that being said, the graphics looked similar to Modern Warfare II and that's what i'm worried about the best. Besides all of that, i'm looking forward to play Modern Warfare III's multiplayer and zombies mode! :D

[potato]

but it is a dlc...

[YaygenMills]

I don't even have to read what you said...If you have to download any update that adds content to an existing application what is that called? Say it with me "Downloadable Content". A.K.A DLC. Thank you for your time. Don't be dumb please.

[Blitzkrieg 2.0 "Virgil"]

"Downloadable Content"

[Wizard101 Enjoyer]

Bait

[ZONE]

Originally posted by The Meg:

Bait

Nope :)

[ZONE]

Originally posted by Blitzkrieg 2.0:

"Downloadable Content"

For COD HQ :)

[ZONE]

Originally posted by Blitzkrieg 2.0:

"Downloadable Content"

For COD HQ Only :)

[ZONE]

Originally posted by YaygenMills:

I don't even have to read what you said...If you have to download any update that adds content to an existing application what is that called? Say it with me "Downloadable Content". A.K.A DLC. Thank you for your time. Don't be dumb please.

For COD HQ, Not MWII :)

[ZONE]

Originally posted by potato:

but it is a dlc...

For COD HQ It Is :)

[djcarey]

Huh?

[potato]

Originally posted by djcarey:

Huh?

it's a troll

[Aqualatics]

Originally posted by ZONE:

It was always meant to be a direct sequel to Modern Warfare II. The whole 70$ dlc was just a rumor, a false rumor that a bunch of people followed the narrative for (myself included but i understood better). To me, i thought the campaign was actually really good! It wasn't perfect but i vastly prefer it to Modern Warfare II's campaign. With that being said, the graphics looked similar to Modern Warfare II and that's what i'm worried about the best. Besides all of that, i'm looking forward to play Modern Warfare III's multiplayer and zombies mode! :D

i like the campaign but it does have mw2 weapons which i dont like

[Uhzu]

Originally posted by ZONE:

Originally posted by potato:

but it is a dlc...

For COD HQ It Is :)

Yup so it’s still dlc. You prove yourself wrong lmao

[Krytor]

you miss the point. Same game engine as MW2, a lot of the game data was already written (boats, cars ect) so it may as well be a DLC, they just want $70 every year and will kill a perfectly good running game to get it. Look at GTA 5, it made Billions and is still running after 10 years. there is just no reason to justify paying for a premium game that is only good for a year

[Leon96]

Originally posted by ZONE:

It was always meant to be a direct sequel to Modern Warfare II. The whole 70$ dlc was just a rumor, a false rumor that a bunch of people followed the narrative for (myself included but i understood better). To me, i thought the campaign was actually really good! It wasn't perfect but i vastly prefer it to Modern Warfare II's campaign. With that being said, the graphics looked similar to Modern Warfare II and that's what i'm worried about the best. Besides all of that, i'm looking forward to play Modern Warfare III's multiplayer and zombies mode! :D

you're ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ right, zone.

it's not a DLC. it's a different game using the same engine on a single launcher. you guys just wanna cry about it because it's on the same engine. there's no reason to mess with CoD's actual engine. the games feel perfect.
the only issue is the reflection grains.

don't buy the game then. play BF 20-24fps with the other guys on different launchers and download 2 120gb games instead of 1 140 gb game with 2 MW's. Geez......