better than battlefield series

[vinz]

title speak 4urself

[Commander GreyFox]

You're an idiot

[Imperial Strikeforce]

It is these days. Battlefield 1 was the last good Battlefield game. 2042 is complete crap.

[Commander GreyFox]

Originally posted by Imperial Strikeforce:

It is these days. Battlefield 1 was the last good Battlefield game. 2042 is complete crap.

Did you play battlefield 5 or are you one of those people who let other decide your opinion?

[XGUNNARX]

bf 5 was good before they ♥♥♥♥♥♥ with the ttk.. and the lack of launch content

[Commander GreyFox]

Originally posted by XGUNNARX:

bf 5 was good before they ♥♥♥♥♥♥ with the ttk.. and the lack of launch content

Ttk is perfectly fine in the game and it has plenty of content.

[RumHam]

Nah

[Smashbery]

BF 3 was a lot of fun , BF 4 was pretty much a finished BF3 but with more pay to play. after that EA just destroyed the series. but then again call of duty is no diffrent.

of course lest see what the fan boy will mouth vomit.

[Commander GreyFox]

Originally posted by Smashbery:

BF 3 was a lot of fun , BF 4 was pretty much a finished BF3 but with more pay to play. after that EA just destroyed the series. but then again call of duty is no diffrent.

of course lest see what the fan boy will mouth vomit.

yeah...no. the best version of rush is in battlefield 1 and bfv has the best gameplay mechanics of the series. i you havent played either game then stfu you opinionless ♥♥♥♥

[tyl0413]

All Battlefields even 5 and 2042 ♥♥♥♥ all over this game.

[Razor973]

2042 was better than this at release and less bugged, but kids won't troll their lovely CoD games

[V3ntilator]

Originally posted by tyl0413:

All Battlefields even 5 and 2042 ♥♥♥♥ all over this game.

Yeah. Warzone 2.0 is awful. It feels like a budget version of the first WZ. Graphics is mediocre too and doesn't even support Ray Tracing this time. The new map is boring too.

Battlefield 2042 is way better than Warzone 2.0.

[tyl0413]

Originally posted by V3ntilator:

Originally posted by tyl0413:

All Battlefields even 5 and 2042 ♥♥♥♥ all over this game.

Yeah. Warzone 2.0 is awful. It feels like a budget version of the first WZ. Graphics is mediocre too and doesn't even support Ray Tracing this time.

Battlefield 2042 is way better than Warzone 2.0.

WZ2 is straight ♥♥♥♥, mp is fine i guess but pretty much unplayable due to SBMM and the general terrible technical state of the game. The fact were out here comparing to 2042 should really say enough about the state of modern gaming, when will people stop buying into all this ♥♥♥♥?

[Zealaequin702]

I like BF's TTK way better than this. I also like the movement in BF since its more realistic. I get it this is a fake arcade shooter that is in no way realistic and operators move at speeds doing acrobatics lifted off magical fairy dust. I'm just saying I prefer the gun mechanics, movement, and TTK of BF. Reason I play CoD; Easy to jump in, I don't have to be strategic to wreck a lobby, it's pretty much zero brains big booms, flashy lights, and clapping like a chimp which I like sometimes.

[V3ntilator]

Originally posted by Razor973:

2042 was better than this at release and less bugged, but kids won't troll their lovely CoD games

BF 2042 also have more maps, variety, more modes, better sound, graphics etc.
It's way better now than it were 1 year ago.

[tyl0413]

Originally posted by V3ntilator:

Originally posted by Razor973:

2042 was better than this at release and less bugged, but kids won't troll their lovely CoD games

BF 2042 also have more maps, variety, more modes, better sound, graphics etc.
It's way better now than it were 1 year ago.

I last played it a year ago and it was in a far better state than this game is rn, I'll check in on it on this years trial to see how much it actually improved.