Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Правила обсуждений
Пожаловаться
https://youtu.be/XDbJSBmfdBE?t=511
I guess they finally solved the hacking problem. No need for hacks if the hacks are literally part of the game.
That's fine. I just think me or you are mixing up default and focusing. I will retest later incase it's me. But I'm pretty sure default has rotational aim assist. It's why practically everyone out there has rotational aim assist.
Either way I think precision is best. It would be even better if you could choose how much it lowers you sensitivity because it's a little to much. I would it where it drops it by about 20% only rather than what feels like 40%.
I think when you say magnetism you are saying the same thing as me when I say it lowers your sensitivity.
Sure he can say everything is auto matic and he isn't adjusting his aim. That doesn't mean that's what is happening.
Just some small time youtube trying to get 400 likes for his video.
Legit information in there about the center dot, thats where your gun will ADS to of course you want to keep that on the target.... And not sprinting around corners.
Absolute trash information in this video also.
Yes we are in agreement about the lowering sensitivity. Default and Precision are my preferred settings. I notice a lower sensitivity when on and near a target.
Those are the only affects I have seen and tested with Default and Precision. The aim assist for those settings are barely noticeable just a slowdown when near or on target.
Sure. Everyone else is wrong and you're right. This guy just made a tutorial that doesn't actually work.
He is talking about that center white dot. Dude thats where your sights ADS onto of course you want the white dot on target. Thats exactly what my post is talking about if you get the pre-ads cursor on a target when you ADS you are already on target.
I mean you don't have to take my word for it I'm just some random stranger on the internet.
But I sure as hell wouldn't take that random strangers word for it as he is selling snake oil.
I'm writing up a tutorial to try and clarify some things for the community here.
That guy is trying to get 400 likes and build his channel with clickbait.
Aim assist makes this the worst possible experience possible on PC and is the strongest aim assist in any shooter so far. I dont have the link, but someone did that bug with the tripod that launches you into the air, and some controller player locked onto him mid flight and instakilled him. Tweaked correctly it is beyond broken and 90% of mouse and keyboard players cannot compete with people that are some of the worst controller players. This game is a horrible experience currently.
Test it tell us how it works, stop copy and pasting the same ♥♥♥♥ like its a conspiracy you're trying to spread.
Give us your data not other peoples. You tell me you saw it here's how it worked I'll believe you.
Saying aim assist is the strongest here in any other COD you've played because you watched a video or because you watched a killcam is not accurate.
You need to use a controller go out and play with the settings play some games and report back.
"here's how ot works"
Oh thank you so much for educating us because everyone here who has done their own testing are obviously not competant adults who have any idea what they are on about.
"All tracking breaks easily and isn't very strong in the first place"
Again. Garbage.
This has been tested by many people, I honestly hope nobody takes this limited testing you've done and believes it in regards to actual real world normal MP gameplay. Your testing is flawed and your presentation of it is massively biased and rather condescending. Even going on to say why mouse is better and has more advantages, like we don't know?
In response to your "testing" and your claims that it isn't very strong (again LMFAO),
The ADS may not snap to target, but nobody said it did, your "tests" actually conclude that it will move onto them if ADSed very close by, so thanks for that, didn't actually know it further adjusted aim for you.
Your claims that the magnetism isn't very strong is ridiculous, how have you tested that exactly? 20 minutes doesn't seem long at all to do that amount of testing to say I was personally testing just one profile for well over 2 hours to make sure results were accurate.
If anyone goes into multiplayer or a private match just to test the magnetism or even watch a video online (like the one that is circulating the forums) there is no doubt in my mind that the majority of people will say it's very strong. Not to mention the rotation assist that is amplified drastically when movement is present.
Where I feel your tests may have failed is by doing these tests with absolutely no movent input whatsoever. Again with that video that is circulating it shows that the magnetism alone without any user input (let alone movement) is strong enough to follow an enemy fully jumping cover to be able to kill them. That is INSANE. That alone disproves your argument.
Now back to my point, WITH user input this aim assist is even stronger, to the point where it glues itself onto enemies. Even if you think it doesn't track very well or whatever. The actual truth of the matter is that in normal online circumstances where movement is involved this aim assist will not leave a target once you're on it with extremely little help from the player actually trying to remain on target.
You're right that if a player aims on an enemy and then does absolutely nothing (no strafing and not touching the aim stick) then yes it is likely that will break aim lock and just firing the gun will not reward a kill. But who in the hell is going to just hold shoot down and expect a kill? Where are we? In 0.1K/D lobbies?
Please retest it for youself and include movement mechanics (Strafing and slight aim input over the target). I honestly know you have no intention of doing any tests that disprove your lovely controller aim assist to be overpowered however so whatever. I'll see you in Hardcore.
This is a literal recorded video evidence and you just straight dismiss it with zero justification.
"Trust me bro" does not make you convincing in any way.
You are the one pulling QAnon antics here.
Now I don't know about rotational aim assist and I didn't test for it. Genome is the only one on here that gave any specifics on how he was able to observe it.
If you can't observe it yourself and you're just pulling ♥♥♥♥ off youtube or what other people are saying how can we take that as fact?
My bias is that I have personally experienced ZERO of the "video evidence" brought forth. I'll try to replicate what genome was talking about with rotational aim assist.
Everything I posted is accurate for what I could replicate and what I've experienced.
Test this ♥♥♥♥ yourself and tell us how it works, seriously I'd like to know.
This person wrote some very biased assumptions and is obviously a controller player, there is absolutely no proof given here.
The whole tone of the post is condescending towards KB&M players. Yes they have an advantage on a level playing field we all know this, so why do top PC players choose a controller? Maybe because it's their prefrence but I'd argue, especially in MW2, it's because it is actually easier if you're good with controller to keep on target.