Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
jumped over troja and i will not buy pharaoh too...
The fact that Pharaoh looks an awful lot like Troy is not a good omen in itself, but beyond that, getting yet another pre-gunpowder game after R2, Attila, ToB, Troy... that's too many games in the ancient/classical era for me maybe.
An India focused one would be cool too.
Outside of historical there's a lot of fantasy that would be cool but I'd like another historical first before another fantasy one
thats the point. Just what i think too.
I like people that believe in santa claus.
Warhamer III has 20k players that are happy to lick up the twenty five overpriced dlc.
Meanwhile, Pharoah has 200 players.
They lack the talent to make new historical games like Empire or Medieval. Do you remember the rounds of big lay-offs?
I doubt that CA has a single member of the original crew left on staff. Those guys had real talent.
The DEI marketing suits have taken over. There is nothing left but fantasy cartoons.