Incorrect portrayal of Pharaoh in the trailer

[friendly player 1]

Archaeology proves that the Egyptians (and the Egyptian leaders) were white.

Now you made some fans upset because of revisionism, and also. No one asked for this.

[Sul Haren]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Victory Forever:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Lotor13:

No, Egyptians were and still are "Middle-Easterners", not blue-eyed blondies ;)

Genetic research as well as archeological and cultural research shows that there were indeed far more blue eyed people in the middle east before the arab conquests. In fact all of the nobility from ancient Sumeria to ancient Egypt had blue eyes as depicted by ancient statuets, figurines, murals, so on so forth.

I don't know what murals and figurines you are looking at, but the vast majority of Egyptian murals and figurines are depicted with darkish skin.. Sometimes blue stones were used for pupils, but most of the time they were black.
Genetical research varies a lot. Ramesses III on the cover apparently had an African haplogroup.

[im-sofa-king-ray-zest]

its clown world tier when 1 race is condemned for representing another race, yet another race is praised for the same thing. but what do you expect when most cant define the difference between men and women now

[ᛁᛖᛊᚢᛊ ᚨᚱ ᚷᚢᛞ]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Lotor13:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Victory Forever:

Genetic research as well as archeological and cultural research shows that there were indeed far more blue eyed people in the middle east before the arab conquests. In fact all of the nobility from ancient Sumeria to ancient Egypt had blue eyes as depicted by ancient statuets, figurines, murals, so on so forth.

Yes, and the medieval vikings were black like sub-saharan african

Seriously, do not believe every bullsh*t, especially things like this - ancient Sumerians with blue eyes

If the Antropolygy (genetic, archeological, cultural resarch) shows us something, it is, that "white people" with blue eyes and blonde or red hairs come from one certain place on the planet - the north europe - groups like Celts, Slavs, Germanic people, Balts

Not the mesopotania or north africa

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Sul Haren:

I don't know what murals and figurines you are looking at, but the vast majority of Egyptian murals and figurines are depicted with darkish skin..

This, these people have darker skin and black hair

The indo-european race came from central asia. They distributed the genes of blue eyes from Northern India to Northern Europe, from North West Africa to North China.

There are still remnants of this race left today in China, chinese people with blue eyes and blond hair, entire tribes of them. Same in Pakistan, several indigenous peoples in Pakistan that look more white than many Europeans. In Yemen as well as Syria you can also find these remnant peoples such as the Yazidis and other remarkable tribes. Blue eyes, red and blond hair.

White mummies with blond hair and red hair has been found in Egypt, such mummies have also been found in Afghanistan too as well as China.

This race became a larger group of subraces for their respective regions, most of them maintaining their physical attributes but changing linguistically and culturally.

You are denying reality and even worse, spreading your ignorance to others, trying to cover up actual history.

[ᛁᛖᛊᚢᛊ ᚨᚱ ᚷᚢᛞ]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Lotor13:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Victory Forever:

The indo-european race came from central asia. They distributed the genes of blue eyes from Northern India to Northern Europe, from North West Africa to North China.

There are still remnants of this race left today in China, chinese people with blue eyes and blond hair, entire tribes of them. Same in Pakistan, several indigenous peoples in Pakistan that look more white than many Europeans. In Yemen as well as Syria you can also find these remnant peoples such as the Yazidis and other remarkable tribes. Blue eyes, red and blond hair.

White mummies with blond hair and red hair has been found in Egypt, such mummies have also been found in Afghanistan too as well as China.

This race became a larger group of subraces for their respective regions, most of them maintaining their physical attributes but changing linguistically and culturally.

You are denying reality and even worse, spreading your ignorance to others, trying to cover up actual history.

"The indo-european race" is non-sense, "indo-european" is term used in linguistics, in connection asociated with languages, not with an etymology

https://www.uottawa.ca/clmc/indo-european-family

"The term Indo-European was introduced in 1816 by Franz Bopp of Germany and referred to a family of languages in Europe and Asia (including Northern India, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh) that were found to have a remarkable structural relationship."

The Proto Indo-Eurpean language come from central asia, not "The indo-european race"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Victory Forever:

You are denying reality and even worse, spreading your ignorance to others, trying to cover up actual history.

LOL
You are spreading pseudo-history and fantasy theories here and blame me...

Educate Yourself before You post something on internet and
embarrass yourself

Of course you quote a site that is ideologically tainted and opposed to actual science and archeology.

The same people who think it was Ramses that ruled Egypt during the time of the Exodus when in actuality it was Thutmoses the third.

The same people who warp and twist actual science into sheer fantasy to fit into modern progressive ideology.

Nothing you say is to be taken seriously. Wikipedia is at best satire and at worst propaganda for the misinformed to blindly believe in.

[Giomanach]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Victory Forever:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Lotor13:

"The indo-european race" is non-sense, "indo-european" is term used in linguistics, in connection asociated with languages, not with an etymology

https://www.uottawa.ca/clmc/indo-european-family

"The term Indo-European was introduced in 1816 by Franz Bopp of Germany and referred to a family of languages in Europe and Asia (including Northern India, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh) that were found to have a remarkable structural relationship."

The Proto Indo-Eurpean language come from central asia, not "The indo-european race"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages


LOL
You are spreading pseudo-history and fantasy theories here and blame me...

Educate Yourself before You post something on internet and
embarrass yourself

Of course you quote a site that is ideologically tainted and opposed to actual science and archeology.

The same people who think it was Ramses that ruled Egypt during the time of the Exodus when in actuality it was Thutmoses the third.

The same people who warp and twist actual science into sheer fantasy to fit into modern progressive ideology.

Nothing you say is to be taken seriously. Wikipedia is at best satire and at worst propaganda for the misinformed to blindly believe in.

it goes both ways ..after all there was no Exodus

[ᛁᛖᛊᚢᛊ ᚨᚱ ᚷᚢᛞ]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Giomanach:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Victory Forever:

Of course you quote a site that is ideologically tainted and opposed to actual science and archeology.

The same people who think it was Ramses that ruled Egypt during the time of the Exodus when in actuality it was Thutmoses the third.

The same people who warp and twist actual science into sheer fantasy to fit into modern progressive ideology.

Nothing you say is to be taken seriously. Wikipedia is at best satire and at worst propaganda for the misinformed to blindly believe in.

it goes both ways ..after all there was no Exodus

Even though they literally found the shrine of the golden calf, just as it was described in the bible, they also found the place of the crossing and the sea bottom there was full of old bronze age chariots. But it's all just a BIG coincidence right?

You need more faith to deny the Exodus than to believe in it.

[Giomanach]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Victory Forever:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Giomanach:

it goes both ways ..after all there was no Exodus

Even though they literally found the shrine of the golden calf, just as it was described in the bible, they also found the place of the crossing and the sea bottom there was full of old bronze age chariots. But it's all just a BIG coincidence right?

You need more faith to deny the Exodus than to believe in it.

it is long proven there where no slaves in Egypt .as the worlds best Egyptologist have proven it

[ᛁᛖᛊᚢᛊ ᚨᚱ ᚷᚢᛞ]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Giomanach:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Victory Forever:

Even though they literally found the shrine of the golden calf, just as it was described in the bible, they also found the place of the crossing and the sea bottom there was full of old bronze age chariots. But it's all just a BIG coincidence right?

You need more faith to deny the Exodus than to believe in it.

it is long proven there where no slaves in Egypt .as the worlds best Egyptologist have proven it

You didn't refute anything, instead you changed the topic. LOL

Btw, there are literal murals of the Pharaoh taking slaves, tens of thousands of slaves in fact.

[Sul Haren]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Victory Forever:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Giomanach:

it goes both ways ..after all there was no Exodus

Even though they literally found the shrine of the golden calf, just as it was described in the bible, they also found the place of the crossing and the sea bottom there was full of old bronze age chariots. But it's all just a BIG coincidence right?

You need more faith to deny the Exodus than to believe in it.

Yeah... That's really a claim that needs a source. Especially the one with the chariots.
Biblical archaeologists would be all over this evidence if it was real.

[Sul Haren]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Giomanach:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Victory Forever:

Even though they literally found the shrine of the golden calf, just as it was described in the bible, they also found the place of the crossing and the sea bottom there was full of old bronze age chariots. But it's all just a BIG coincidence right?

You need more faith to deny the Exodus than to believe in it.

it is long proven there where no slaves in Egypt .as the worlds best Egyptologist have proven it

That's untrue. Egyptians had slaves, just less that often assumed and used for less important tasks than construction of temples.
What there is no evidence of is specifically a large amount of Hebrew slaves that escaped as described in the Bible.

[Giomanach]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Sul Haren:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Victory Forever:

Even though they literally found the shrine of the golden calf, just as it was described in the bible, they also found the place of the crossing and the sea bottom there was full of old bronze age chariots. But it's all just a BIG coincidence right?

You need more faith to deny the Exodus than to believe in it.

Yeah... That's really a claim that needs a source. Especially the one with the chariots.
Biblical archaeologists would be all over this evidence if it was real.

Zahi Hawass for one..also quoting a book of fairy tales is not fact an Biblical archaeologists have proven nothing ..they faked a giant they faked the finding of the ark etc

[Giomanach]

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Sul Haren:

Αναρτήθηκε αρχικά από Giomanach:

it is long proven there where no slaves in Egypt .as the worlds best Egyptologist have proven it

That's untrue. Egyptians had slaves, just less that often assumed and used for less important tasks than construction of temples.
What there is no evidence of is specifically a large amount of Hebrew slaves that escaped as described in the Bible.

they never had slaves to build an they where not jews either

[Giomanach]

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/jan/11/great-pyramid-tombs-slaves-egypt

[Giomanach]

https://www.egypttoday.com/Article/4/88439/Hawass-%E2%80%98The-Great-Pyramids-were-not-built-by-slaves%E2%80%99

[Giomanach]

to just link two...like i said it is long proven slaves where not used to build anything