Panthon suggestions: India and Japan

[A kobold]

Mostly Japan that pantheon would be nice, and it would be cool to have a naval and melee focused set.

mean while India would be really good for a Calvary focused one aka Elephants That and multi headed king cobra unit would be cool. Think that is from India.

[Swarke]

I think it will be Aztecs since the old AoM had the mod for it

[BananaBob]

+1 for Aztecs or Mayans (just one of them pls)

[Zeno]

Ursprungligen skrivet av A kobold:

Mostly Japan that pantheon would be nice, and it would be cool to have a naval and melee focused set.

mean while India would be really good for a Calvary focused one aka Elephants That and multi headed king cobra unit would be cool. Think that is from India.

Japan? No thanks.

India, ok.

[A kobold]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Furchenlurch:

Ursprungligen skrivet av A kobold:

Mostly Japan that pantheon would be nice, and it would be cool to have a naval and melee focused set.

mean while India would be really good for a Calvary focused one aka Elephants That and multi headed king cobra unit would be cool. Think that is from India.

Japan? No thanks.

India, ok.

whats wrong with japan? don't like the Yokai?

India has some good mythology and you rarely see it in games.

Ursprungligen skrivet av BananaBob:

+1 for Aztecs or Mayans (just one of them pls)

Would rather have Aztecs do to their heavy religion and the sacrifice for favor mentality. more expensive the unit you sacrifice the more favor it gives. Sacrifice a hero for a large boost.

Also quetzalcoatl main god would be fun, flying snakes.

[Zeno]

Ursprungligen skrivet av A kobold:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Furchenlurch:

Japan? No thanks.

India, ok.

whats wrong with japan? don't like the Yokai?

India has some good mythology and you rarely see it in games.

Ursprungligen skrivet av BananaBob:

+1 for Aztecs or Mayans (just one of them pls)

Would rather have Aztecs do to their heavy religion and the sacrifice for favor mentality. more expensive the unit you sacrifice the more favor it gives. Sacrifice a hero for a large boost.

Also quetzalcoatl main god would be fun, flying snakes.

Nothing wrong with Japan, I just don't like to see weeb stuff infused into every game I play.

India is interesting though.

[A kobold]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Furchenlurch:

Ursprungligen skrivet av A kobold:

whats wrong with japan? don't like the Yokai?

India has some good mythology and you rarely see it in games.





Would rather have Aztecs do to their heavy religion and the sacrifice for favor mentality. more expensive the unit you sacrifice the more favor it gives. Sacrifice a hero for a large boost.

Also quetzalcoatl main god would be fun, flying snakes.

Nothing wrong with Japan, I just don't like to see weeb stuff infused into every game I play.

India is interesting though.

Oh mythological Japan is nothing like the weeb stuff. It makes the weeb stuff look like childs play.

[Zeno]

Ursprungligen skrivet av A kobold:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Furchenlurch:

Nothing wrong with Japan, I just don't like to see weeb stuff infused into every game I play.

India is interesting though.

Oh mythological Japan is nothing like the weeb stuff. It makes the weeb stuff look like childs play.

I am aware because I am not an idiot. I just don't want this content to attract this...pool..

[A kobold]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Furchenlurch:

Ursprungligen skrivet av A kobold:

Oh mythological Japan is nothing like the weeb stuff. It makes the weeb stuff look like childs play.

I am aware because I am not an idiot. I just don't want this content to attract this...pool..

That is a bad reason to not want it though, that is not wanting something because it might attract like a small amount of idiots.

Sorry we already have furries from half the gods.

[The Owlogram]

Genuine question: why does everyone seem to want Aztecs in the game? They are from the 14th century, why would they end up in a game about antiquity when there are actual super old American cultures that would fit better?

[Rhalius]

Japan would be good to make China less isolated and they have plenty of familiar mythological creatures to work with. And a strong familiar mythology is what will sell. That and Japan tends to be a popular playable option in historic strategy games too.

Aztecs would be a poor pick since their most familiar mythological creature, the feathered serpent, is already there with the Egyptians.
They also have no cavalry, no ships, no siege. They lack in too many categories, if they want to add a meso american civ, it should be an earlier one too I think. There is bound to be one with a richer mythology.

Though for me Celts would be the first pick.
Strong mythology with werewolves, fairies, goblins and much more familiar creatures, something interesting can be done with their druids and chariots too. They would be very different from the Norse and make them less isolated too.

Babylonians or persians could also be good to have.

[Jäveln]

think aztecs would be interesting with a sacrifice mechanic to gain favor and it had some weird gods

[Zeno]

Ursprungligen skrivet av A kobold:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Furchenlurch:

I am aware because I am not an idiot. I just don't want this content to attract this...pool..

That is a bad reason to not want it though, that is not wanting something because it might attract like a small amount of idiots.

Sorry we already have furries from half the gods.

Well I don't want the good old AoM that way , altered with new stuff. If they want new stuff ,they should simply make an AoM2.

The Chinese already were a bad idea for the definitive edition.

[A kobold]

Ursprungligen skrivet av The Owlogram:

Genuine question: why does everyone seem to want Aztecs in the game? They are from the 14th century, why would they end up in a game about antiquity when there are actual super old American cultures that would fit better?

Yay Mayan would make more sense, but it is more do to the Aztecs having a vibrant mythology and potential systems that match the games.

[A kobold]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Furchenlurch:

Ursprungligen skrivet av A kobold:

That is a bad reason to not want it though, that is not wanting something because it might attract like a small amount of idiots.

Sorry we already have furries from half the gods.

Well I don't want the good old AoM that way , altered with new stuff. If they want new stuff ,they should simply make an AoM2.

The Chinese already were a bad idea for the definitive edition.

you do realize this is basicly AoM2 right?

[A kobold]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Rhalius:

Japan would be good to make China less isolated and they have plenty of familiar mythological creatures to work with. And a strong familiar mythology is what will sell. That and Japan tends to be a popular playable option in historic strategy games too.



Though for me Celts would be the first pick.
Strong mythology with werewolves, fairies, goblins and much more familiar creatures, something interesting can be done with their druids and chariots too. They would be very different from the Norse and make them less isolated too.

Babylonians or persians could also be good to have.

Celts, yeah werewolves would be fun, a unit that can swap between a standard and myth unit. Just imagine it in its default form it looks like their standard melee unit, but can swap to wolf form at the push of a button, at the cost of favor, and while turning back is free you can only do it after the unit gets a kill.