安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
I mean, they could've just renamed them? It'd still be annoying, but moderately less so.
What bothers me the most is not that culturally-dependent slurs are taboo, it's that whether they are or are not is entirely dependent on who is slurring whom. It's not the action being done, but who is doing it.
No where is this more silly than here with the 'skraeling' debacle. Sure, it could be considered a slur, but one used 1,000 years ago by a people against another people who, if they even could still be considered to exist, are so drastically different than they were back then that they could hardly be considered the same groups at all.
But how much you wanna bet that no one in HR has any problems when a game has a Comanche refer to the Yankees as 'Pale-faces'?
It's a shame we don't know what they were. Too bad no one could get a word in edge-wise, what with that tomahawk flying straight at their skulls the moment they stepped out of the bushes.