Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español - España (Spanska - Spanien)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanska - Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (Portugisiska – Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugisiska - Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (Ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
There is no point on making a Romans civ now. Their units would just be EXACTLY the Atlantean ones.
All I see are Gladiator inspired units, hardly an adequate representation of the Romans.
Everything that is presented on this subject (Atlanteans = Romans ) is extremely vague. Just repeat the same things over and over again without presenting evidence or refuting arguments to the contrary.
I'd love to see anything from the Celts to the Japanese or even some Slavic pantheon.
Destroyer: A mixture of secutor with the reriarius.
Murmillo: There is literally a gladiator with that name, with those same characteristics.
Fanatic: Dimachaerus has these same characteristics .
The evidence is clear, the information and references do not lie. I'm not saying there aren't references to Romans, but they're not even remotely revering the right things. It is not even remotely enough to be considered an adequate and sufficient representation of the Roman.
And honestly, the look of all these units and the architecture It doesn't remind me of the Romans at all.
How would the inclusion of India be woke? Given the sheer number of gods in Hinduism and the sheer variety among them, it's practically tailor made for the concept of this game. I'd like to see the Celts too. And some kind of Native American nation down the line. I'm assuming they won't be stopping after the second pantheon is revealed, though I guess that depends on sales.
A mazdeist pantheon would be nice but not known enough neither for a next DLC.
The second will probably be a tests to see if people are interested and will use popular or know pantheons. China was in the extended edition, so it's just a matter of reworking something already done and improve it.
I assume they'll rework the Chinese DLC. As an AoM fan I was going to buy it for AoM, but then I saw the overwhelmingly negative response—apparently it was regarded as a lazy piece of work. Hopefully this new Chinese DLC will be improved.
The Titans should have gone by their Roman names, and have the reveal that the new Gods the Atlanteans were worshiping are the Titans after the Mount Olympus mission.
It would be hard for the chinese to be worse this time around.
I wouldn't call it a lazy piece of work. It was made by the same team that gave us the forgotten empire and other DLC for Age of Empire II before the Definitive edition. In my opinion, they tried to make a good extention for Age of mythology but modding a civ for AoE and AoM isn't quite the same, they had to create new units, building, myth units, powers and everything from nothing, when the only specificities in Age of Empire were two techs and one unit